Let's see if you can back yo your loud mouth assertiosn with your own fact, Nate Boy:
(LOL what a child you are! Lose the temper Jumior, m'k? )
>The best response to this sort of fundamentalist/literalist drabble is some probing, critical questioning, followed up by some sold facts, rather than repeated tired worn out cliches.
Why that's a good idea, Nate but what were you doing in the paragraph below?
>I see little difference between mainstream fundies and Watchtower fundies, both types are frightened of science
(This is my personal experience with many dozens of fundiots, from many fundiot churches. I was myself a fundiot for 15 years. It was simple ignorance. Ignorance can be fixed, but syupidity last for a lifetime Junior, m'k?)
How are fundamentalists (your label, not that I accept it as I would be proud to be a 'fundy' but I am really a moderate) 'frightened of scientists'? Typically, creationists use the same evidence as evolutionists and are honest enough to admit that they begin their reasoning with presuppositions. This is what the evolutionists do but rarely admit.
(Sounds to me like you need to read some evolutionists rebuttals of creationism. Remember Junior (you started this by calling me Nate Boy, junior, m'k?) I was a fundiot myself, and had almost evry anti-evolution pro-creation book cranked out by the ENGINEERS (not scientists) in the Scientific Creationism movement)
> of logical deeply probing questions,
Where does logic and rational thinking come from in the first place, Nate? What has given us the ability to think above the level of animal instinct? How has 'evolutionary pressure' done this on its own?
(Well, junior, this ability [on a physical level] comes from the Yahweh Elohim, on a spiritual level it comes from the Heavenly Father of Jesus the Christ, who is NOT the Yahweh Elohim.)
>and the use of our adult critical thinking faculties when it comes to religion.
Define this as the presupposition that no miracles have happened because we do not admit they can happen. You can see the views of the infamous, wacked out 'Jesus Seminar' scholars for more detail on that statement.
(Miracles happen junior, just as horrible genetic mutations, such as yourself, occur, m'k junior?)
> Thye put their religion in a special compartment to keep it safe from examination, then lash out at others who don't dribble their drabble.
Actually, we hold skeptics accountable to a truly unbiased view of religion and deny them the right to set the limits of any debate. A liberal believer typically 'caves in' to skeptics demands and presuppositions, giving away the battle before it begins.
(LOL I am no typical liberal, m'k junior? No one is truly unbiased, m'k junior? Neither you nor I nor anyone else)
> Sound familiar? WTBTS! So many Witnesses leave the WTBTS only to become enslaved to a fundy version of the same mental and spiritual bondage in another package.
>I have yet to meet a fundamentalist who wanted to be anything else but a fundy, but I will make some recommendations anyway.
Don't bother, we have already seen the blasphemous and ridiculous parodies of god that skeptics pass off as 'good to read'.
(As I said, fundiots such as yourself enjoy being fundiots, right junior? M'k? Now junior, I didn't read the entire post because it was long and BORING and I have already been a fundiot for FIFTEEN of my 52 years, even becoming a Baptist minister after Bible College, and continued my ministry through cemetary...er, seminary. Just as I do NOT need to read John 3:16-17, I do not need to read fundiot drabble, m'k junior? Fundiotism is predictable and BORING. Just remember junior, m'k, that you won't ever grow beyond being a fundiot unless you take a step away from it and read other materials, m'k?)
Okay Rex, now that we're finished with the testosterone crap and all the nonsense, why did you take my response personally? That post is NOT YOUR WORDS and I did not realize you agreed with it! I was tired tired tired when I was reading your post and made the mistake of thinking you disagreed with it, so I responded to you as I would to someone who disagreed with the article. I'm sorry. My mistake. I'm no one's boy Rex, just as you are no one's junior. Continued blessings to you sir!
Nathan