rexanne,
Why not try to rebut the essay itself?
i do rebut the essays from other sites that you post, but it doesn't stop you from posting more insanity. plus, you dodge the issue by asking me to rebut the essay, which would be easy. YOU, have the burden of proof, since YOU posted the essay, and YOU have the implicit assertion in god jesus.
Anyways, when we study the facts that are acually observable and measurable, we are led to the conclusion that the best explanation for our existence is that there is an Intelligent Designer.
non sequitur. argument from design. argument from ignorance.
We do not have to prove any of your four points. We offer our conclusion as a more rational theory than naturalists have to offer.
sorry. the rules apply to you too big boy. you make an extraordinary, unparsimonious, uneconomical assertion, YOU have the burden of proof.
you don't get it do you? you say you offer a rational conclusion, that creates more questions than there are answers for, is unfalsifiable, and YOU think that YOU are beyond the burden of proof? quit wasting our freaking time!
After that fact, it is my opinion that Christianity provides the most reasonable explanation for WHY we are here and the truth about eternity.
your "opinion" is not yours at all. it was made for you by many others before you, and you accepted it like you accepted gravity. if it was your opinion, there wouldn't be a billion other apes that believe the same thing.
christianity is a farce. i don't expect you to see it, what being such a hot shot member and all.
TS