Misinformation in CoC

by ICBehindtheCurtain 31 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • ICBehindtheCurtain
    ICBehindtheCurtain

    Hello everyone, I know that many here like me have read Ray's book Crisis of Consience, I was very impressed with it, it helped open my eyes to the hypocrisy and double standards of the WTS, and Ray gave me the impresion of being a very loving and kind man, not the demonized apostate we were all lead to believe. BUT, I noticed something that wasn't quite correct when I was reading the part that spoke of then brother René Vázquez, he makes it seem like all René did was have private conversations with Ray and nothing else, this is not true, I for a fact know that this was not all that happened.

    In a MS Meeting on Tuesday back in 1980, René was conducting a part and he went up to the stage with only his bible, he started saying that all we needed was the bible, that we would no longer be using other publications by the WTS , everyone looked around at each other shocked, this also went on in the various congregation book studies that week, 8 out of 9 elders were in on it, they all were saying that all we needed was the bible, these other books were unnecessary, well, a week later was the Memorial, Vazquez gave the talk and said some weird stuff about how all christians are sons of god and other stuff that I can't remember, it was a while back, but everyone was looking over at each other and wondering what was going on. Rafael Angulo which was one of the elders and a good freind of Vazquez, partook of the emblems, so did Vazquez, everyone was very surprised to say the least, one of the sisters was outraged and marched down to Bethel to tell them about this, another person had recorded the meeting, because Vazquez was an excellent speaker and had quite a following, this tape was turned in to Bethel for evidence against Vazquez.

    This is what really happened, thats why I was quite surprised when all of that was left out of the CoC book, although today I don't agree at all with the WTS what René did, I feel was wrong, if he wanted to enlighten others, he should have done this privately, what was he thinking? that the WTS was just going to let him take over the KH? That following sunday we had a special talk by none other than Freddy Franz himself, and other WTS elite, he was saying stuff about how we must follow Jehovah's organization and not listen to private reasonings, (If only I knew then what I know now) anyway, Vazquez and Angulo were disfellowshipped along with Vazquez' mom, his wife, some of the pioneers and others. The congregation was really shaken by this, but the majority stayed on. Below is an excerpt from the book, although it is in spanish, I will translate some of it.

    Se puede decir verdaderamente que ninguna de las personas expulsadas abrigaba idea alguna de separarse de los Testigos de Jehová, o tenía idea alguna de animar a otros a separarse. La actitud de ellos se expresa vivamente en esta carta escrita por René Vázquez al apelar la acción que se tomó contra él y su esposa:

    It can be truthfully said, that none of the disfellowshipped persons had any desire of separating themselves from the Jehovah's Witnesses, or had any desire of getting others to separate themselves. They express themselves vividly in this letter written by René Vazquez in his appeal of the action taken against him and his wife:

    René Vázquez

    4 de Mayo 1980

    Comité Judicial

    Estimados hermanos:

    Hallo necesario una vez más, por este medio, apelar a su razonamiento sano y juicio imparcial para que vean que no somos culpables de la acusación que se ha hecho en contra de nosotros, mi esposa y yo. Nosotros, de hecho, realmente no entendemos ni conocemos quiénes son nuestros acusadores. (We in fact, don't rightly know who are our accusers)

    Durante nuestra reunión judicial, ver tras vez declaramos, desde el corazón, con toda veracidad ante Jehová Dios, que la mismísima idea de promover una secta, o ser apóstatas, es sumamente inconcebible de nuestra parte. ¿No se deja ver esto por mi servicio dedicado a Jehová Dios por los pasados treinta años, al grado de dar atención mínima a mi familia y a mi trabajo seglar? ¿Por qué debieran las recientes acciones con respecto a la consideración de algunos puntos de la Biblia en conversación privada con algunos queridos hermanos y amigos, de pronto tomarse como un ataque en contra de la organización, o como apostasía? (Why should recent actions with respect to considering some Bible points en a private conversation with some of our dear brothers and sisters, be quickly taken as an atack against the organization, or like an apostasy?)¿Por qué se debiera tomar una acción tan extremada como la de expulsión, cuando razonamiento sano, bondad, verdadero amor cristiano y misericordia, podrían enmendar y sanar cualesquier malos entendimientos junto con dolor de corazón que resultaran de habla imprudente, o la repetición de cosas que no estén en armonía con lo que se ha publicado por la Sociedad? ¿Dónde está la persona mala, la persona inícua, el odiador de Jehová, la persona rebelde, el obrador de actos inícuos, no arrepentido que debiera eliminarse? ¿Por qué debiera una definición legalista de apostasía usarse de una manera tan fría y sin misericordia para condenar a personas que no han hecho otra cosa sino servir fielmente y derramar sus almas a favor de los hermanos por tantos años?

    ¿Quienes son los que están causando reproche al nombre de Jehová, y dando un mal nombre o imagen a la organización? ¿No son las acciones drásticas que se están tomando, y los métodos desamorados que se están usando, y los rumores calumniadores que se están esparciendo, y la falta de misericordia y amor cristiano, la sospecha, el temor y terror de investigaciones inquisitorias, lo que está multiplicando mil veces más cualquier mal entendimiento o daño no intencinal debido a que algunas personas repitieran impropiamente algunas cosas que se dijeron? (who is it that is causing reproach to Jehovah's name and giving a bad name or image to the organization? Is it not the drastic actions that are being taken, and the loveless methods that are bing used, and the lying rumors that are being spread, and the lack of mercy and cristian love, the suspicion, the fear and terror of inquisitory investigations, what is multiplying a thousand times more any misunderstanding or unintentional damage due to some persons repeating inapropiately some things they heard?)

    Hermanos, no hay nada sino amor en nuestro corazón por la entera asociación de nuestros hermanos, y de ninguna manera mi esposa y yo jamás hemos querido obrar con, ni hemos tenido, algún designio malicioso para causar confusión y perturbación de la fe de ellos. ¿Cómo trataría Jesucristo una situación como ésta?

    Parece que el objetivo principal del comité era establecer culpabilidad, por establecer qye había apostasía. A pesar de nuestras expresiones repetidas del corazón, de que el seguir un curso de apostasía nos es inconcebible,que tal cosa nunca entró en nuestro corazón, esa acusación continuó haciéndose. El comité parece haber estado dedicado a probar que éramos apóstatas por medio de probar que conversaciones privadas que tuvimos con algunos de nuestros queridos hermanos, eran en efecto, parte de un complot malicioso para formar una secta o causar división por apostasía. (The comittee seems to be trying to prove that we were apostates by proving that private conversations that we had with some of our dear brothers, were in effect, part of a malicious plot to form a sect or to cause division by apostasy)En dos ocasiones diferentes el hermani Harold Jackson usó la ilustración de una muchacha joven que hubiera cometido fornicación, pero que en su mente, la idea de hacer eso era tan rechazada que ella, en efecto, creía que no había, y sin embargo ella estaba encinta. La aplicación sería que no importa cuán aborrecible sea para nosotros la idea de ser apóstatas, que no importa si nuestro corazón y conciencia nos dijeran que era inconcebible para nosotros hacer una cosa así, aún así somos apóstatas.
    will translate some

    You know? I really feel for the guy, but this was not the right way to go about it. He probably thought that what he was doing was right, but I just wonder why he thought that what he said was done in a private setting, maybe he was having emotional problems or something, anyway I heard that Vazquez was killed in a car accident last year I think, poor people, they sacrificed so much of their life for this CRAP! I wonder how his wife and sone are doing, and Rafael and Jenny Angulo, I wonder what became of all of them if any of you know, please let me know.

    IC

  • candidlynuts
    candidlynuts

    thats interesting information.

    would Ray Franz have known about this event?

  • ICBehindtheCurtain
    ICBehindtheCurtain

    He knew René and had many freinds in the spanish halls, he spoke perfect spanish I don't see why he wouldn't have heard about this, it seems strange.

    IC

  • Narkissos
    Narkissos

    Quite interesting. Were you at the meeting, IC?

    All I can say is, if Vazquez really said that in a public meeting he has all the more my respect.

    I guess the discrepancy with his official letter might be due to the fact he didn't know he had been recorded and/or the JC didn't hold that public statement against him. Anyway, even as you relate the event this was not a formal call to break away from the organisation -- rather a desperate attempt to change it from inside.

    Fwiw, the hearsay echo I had from this story in the early 80's (I was in the French Bethel then) is that most of this congregation partook in the Memorial, and this raised the suspicion of the Brooklyn Bethel when they got the figures. If the tape had been sent to Bethel right away I doubt René would have been allowed to give the Memorial talk.

  • bull01lay
    bull01lay

    IMO, if this is in fact a true representation of what went on, then I think Vasquez chose the best course available at the time. If he had chosen to try to do it quietly, or privately, it would be viewed as if he were trying to coerse, or target weaker ones into wrong thinking. If the WTS got wind of it, they would, without doubt, have attempted to discredit and silence him exactly as you say they did, but then less people would have heard what he had to say - less seeds of doubt would have been sown.

    No, he acted in the best way he knew how, and should be commended.

    - Just my opinion,

    Bull!

  • AK - Jeff
    AK - Jeff

    I cannot imagine how he thought he could get away with this - but then again in those days, previous to R Franz' expulsion from Bethel etc, I doubt there was such an eye on brothers who took a bit more radical approach to using the Bible, like Rene apparently did from your account.

    I think you, as an eyewitness to this event, should email Ray and ask the same question, in a non accusatory way of course.

    Perhaps Ray played it down some to strenghten his arguments in the book. That would be wrong, and it seems a little out of character for him. But then he is human after all. And he was, in spite of all good intents, bound to have a bias toward those who felt like he did about things.

    I would imagine that certain features of any of our memories of the borg might be a bit heavy leaning toward how we or others were wronged, rather than a totally unbiased view. We tend to remember that which supports our leaning first and with greater weight.

    Jeff

  • Cygnus
    Cygnus

    I have to disagree with my esteemed colleague Nark here...

    if he wanted to enlighten others, he should have done this privately, what was he thinking?

    He was thinking along the same lines I was thinking when I gave my last MS talk - I really need to HELP these poor lost souls and GET THEM THE TRUE GOSPEL. I concluded by reading the passage in Galatians, gesturing to the entire crowd, "you are ALL sons of God." Except I got lots of compliments on my talk afterwards, even though it was a partial dismantling of the little flock/other sheep doctrine. I just attended a small congo in suburban Buffalo.

    I went through almost a year of that junk before I finally rid myself of worrying about whether people knew anything about Jesus. My hope would be that Rene rid himself of the yoke of christianity too.

  • Narkissos
    Narkissos
    I have to disagree with my esteemed colleague Nark here...
    if he wanted to enlighten others, he should have done this privately, what was he thinking?

    Er... I didn't write that, IC did.

  • ozziepost
    ozziepost
    I would imagine that certain features of any of our memories of the borg might be a bit heavy leaning toward how we or others were wronged, rather than a totally unbiased view. We tend to remember that which supports our leaning first and with greater weight.

    One of the wisest statements I've read here on JWD.

  • ozziepost
    ozziepost
    I didn't write that, IC did

    Better to be hung for.......oh, I forget!!!

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit