My letter of annulment. LOL I am going to tell everyone it worked.

by jwfacts 15 Replies latest jw experiences

  • jwfacts
    jwfacts

    I have posted below my letter of annulment for anyone that wants to use it. They said that they would not honour it because I was baptised for too long and had entered pioneering and bethel. However, I know of several people where annulment did work, but generally if they were baptised for only a couple of years and had not accepted 'privileges".

    The key would be to change it to be applicable to your circumstances. I have quoted articles from around the time of my baptism. It is not necessary to rave on as much as i did or threaten suing, but I was already undergoing a judicial committee. WORD OF WARNING This may get you dissassociated. If you do not want to be harrassed just fade. However, if you were intending on disassociating yourself this may be a better way of doing it.

    The main thrust of the letter for those that don't want to read it all is:

    [A] My baptism should be annulled as I was manipulated by lies as a minor. (It can work even if you were not a minor)

    [B] The lies that I based my baptism on were 1) WTS always taught 1914 was the start of the conclusion of the system of things. 2) there are more earthquakes now than ever before, proving it to be the last days since 1914 3) The holy spirit directs appointments of overseers and doctrine.

    BTW - A few people have not understood if I am d/f or not, it seems the new announcement " XXX is no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses" is confusing the brothers. In my final appeal I requested they once again look at my request for annulment. As they did not advise me that they had made a decision, or what it was and are refusing to put anything in writing I will assume that my baptism was annulled and will tell any JWs that I am not disfellowshipped. I am going to refuse to act like I have been disfellowshipped and will talk to JWs regardless of whether they like it or not. If a JW enters my house to pick up my children, talk to my wife, whatever, I will act no differently than I ever have towards them.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Service Committee
    Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Australia
    2-4 Zouch Road
    Denham Court NSW 2565

    DATED: 20/12/2005

    This letter is to request that my baptism be annulled. This way I will no longer be considered as one of the congregation and avoided as one of the world. I would like to make it clear that I am in no way disassociating myself from any congregation, office or organization associated with Jehovah’s Witnesses.

    Several months ago I requested for xxx and xxx to arrange an annulment of my baptism, a request they refused to consider. I had hoped that my total absence from meetings for a number of months, and non association with Jehovah’s Witness friends was indication enough that I am not as a follower of the Watchtower Society. However disciplinary visitations by elders in the congregation show that this matter needs to be formalized. I am now requesting an annulment in writing as I no longer wish to experience the ongoing harassment that I have endured over the past twelve months from Luc and various other brothers. Neither do I wish to be judged by unchristian principles that are based around the creed of men rather than the regulations of God.

    This request for annulment is in order to remove myself from being considered part of any congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses and particularly the Parramatta Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses, it’s individual elders or it’s legal corporation, the Governing Body of Jehovah’s Witnesses or it’s legal corporations, The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc., The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc., The International Bible Students Association, The Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Australia, or any other agency not here named, including all or any agents or assignees. I further request all agents and assignees cease and desist from harassment, stalking, slandering, and/or infringing on my rights.

    My annulment is not due to a lack of faith in God; it is solely due to it coming to my attention that my baptism unknowingly included a commitment to an organization that is in effect no more than a legal entity run by men.

    Annulment is an option as I am aware of several cases where this has been successfully applied for, including my auntie who was subsequently re-baptized and another person who was not re-baptized.

    There is significant cause for annulment. When I was baptized at the age of 16 I was not of legal age to make life’s most important decisions, including marriage, consumption of alcohol, voting and joining an army. Jesus himself was not baptized until the age of 30. Therefore I believe the Watchtower Society uses coercion of impressionable minors to build its ranks. I was misled into forming a contract with the Watchtower Society which binds me to the regulations of the Jehovah’s Witnesses Governing Body, under false pretences of it being “god’s spirit directed organization”. Until this year I believed the Watchtower publications to be truthful. The research I have done at the request of Luc Kikkert has resulted in me finding otherwise.

    My baptism and hence contract with the Watchtower Society and my entire life since was based in part on three lies the Watchtower Society uses to misrepresent itself as God’s organization;
    * the apparent fact that these are the last days based on a dramatic increase in earthquakes
    * that the Watchtower Society foretold 1914 as the start of the last days
    * that Holy Spirit directs Watchtower Society doctrine and the appointment and disfellowshipping of brothers
    The following quotes support that the statements made above were prevalent at the time of my baptism and they continue to be so.
    I no longer have access to the Aid to bible Understanding that I studied constantly as a youth. However, the passage on earthquakes that greatly affected my life is contained now in Insight Into the Scriptures volume 1 p.669:
    “Jesus foretold earthquakes in significant number and intensity as a feature of the sign of his presence. (Mt 24:3, 7, 8; Lu 21:11) Since 1914 C.E., there has been an increase in the number of earthquakes, resulting in much distress. With data obtained from the National Geophysical Data Center in Boulder, Colorado, supplemented by a number of standard reference works, a tabulation was made in 1984 that included only earthquakes that measured 7.5 or more on the Richter scale, or that resulted in destruction of five million dollars (U.S.) or more in property, or that caused 100 or more deaths. It was calculated that there had been 856 of such earthquakes during the 2,000 years before 1914. The same tabulation showed that in just 69 years following 1914 there were 605 of such quakes. These statistics are a means of indicating the extent of suffering from earthquakes during this period of history.”

    This is a gross misrepresentation of facts. With research anyone can find that there have been a fairly constant number of earthquakes for thousands of years. There has been no increase in the number of earthquakes since 1914 or in the power of earthquakes. The 1900’s has not even had the most deaths from all earthquakes combined, the largest or the most destructive earthquakes.

    The other concept that I found very important in committing my life to the Watchtower Society was the remarkable insight Russell had under God’s direction to understand bible prophecy in regards to 1914. This regularly is used as proof that Jehovah’s holy spirit was guiding his earthly organization through Russell and so a clear indicator of this being the only true religion. As stated in the Awake! 1973 January 22 p.8

    ”Of all men used by God to prophesy, Jesus is outstanding. Based on what he said, along with the words of Daniel and John, Jehovah's witnesses pointed to the year 1914, decades in advance, as marking the start of "the conclusion of the system of things."

    When the Watchtower refers to the history of the doctrine of 1914 it generally does so by the used of misinformation, however I am sure you would be aware that the above quote is a very direct lie. In fact, nothing Russell pointed to about 1914 has come to pass. Russell believed that the last days started in 1799, Jesus rulership began in 1874 and 1914 was to conclude matters, it was never said to be the start, it was always said to be the end. It was not until the 1930’s that Rutherford overturned a large number of Russell’s teachings and date prophecies and put in place what now resembles the modern day Jehovah's Witnesses. This did not happen in 1919 which Watchtower publications now point to as the date when Jesus cleansed his temple.

    The third point critical to my decision to be baptized is that the Watchtower publications imply that Holy Spirit directs the organization Jehovah’s Witnesses identify as represented by the Watchtower Society. This is in the area of doctrine, appointments and disfellowshipping. The only reason I was baptized as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses was that I relied on the statements that holy spirit does indeed direct the organization, if it does not why would anyone follow it? Statements such as the following are made;
    W87 8/1 p.19
    “Recommendations and appointments are made after prayer and under the guidance of the holy spirit. To such nonanointed elders Paul’s counsel applies with equal force: “Pay attention to yourselves and to all the flock, among which the holy spirit has appointed you overseers.”—Acts 20:28.”
    pe chap. 23 p.195
    No, being governed theocratically, they follow the example of the early governing body in Jerusalem, whose decisions were based on God’s Word and were made under the direction of holy spirit.”
    W58 5/1 p.285
    “Since that spirit of God operates in conjunction with the organization, to the extent that the local overseers, ministerial assistants and individual ministers respond to the counsel provided them through the theocratic organization, to that extent the way is open by this means for the free flow of God’s holy spirit.”

    In regards to doctrine the organization has a history of introducing wrong teachings, such as the dates mentioned previously, the meaning of pyramids, the requirement to worship Jesus up until the 1950’s and so on. They have also changed back to the original stance on a number of life and death issues such as the meaning of superior authorities and the use or organ transplants. None of these can be simply dismissed as new light, they were wrong doctrine introduced by the Watchtower Society and then discarded.

    In regards to appointments the above quotes were similarly misleading. As you may personably be aware, I was in xxx congregation when xxx was appointed as an elder, despite the fact that he was having at that very time, and had been having for seven years, an adulterous affair whilst in Bethel. Where was the Holy Spirit in that appointment? I know of numerous such cases, such as xxx who was a practicing homosexual when he accepted his appointment as a Ministerial Servant in Parramatta congregation. I also know of numerous cases of people that continue to be brothers and sisters despite ongoing wrongdoing over many years. Why does the Holy Spirit not uncover such wrongdoing if it truly guides this organization alone?

    Jesus said we are to be baptized in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit. As a 16 year old I did not understand the implication that my baptism vow also adds “as one of Jehovah's Witnesses in association with God's spirit-directed organization?” (W85 6/1 p.30) I did not know that this meant I would become bound for life by a legal earthly organization that has built up a wealth of man made rules. How as a 16 year old could I make an informed decision that I was committing myself for life to an earthly organization when the very organization I trusted had no qualms about lying in areas that mattered most to me?

    If I knew the above Watchtower statements to not be true, to not be from God, but rather carefully fabricated lies I would never have considered Jehovah's Witnesses to be accurately worshipping God and not have been baptized in association with this particular organization. Now that I am aware of these things I wish for my baptism to be annulled as what I was led to believe I was agreeing with was a misrepresentation of truth. I now wish to be given peace from further harassment in order to recover from the manipulation that I have suffered my entire life from trusting in the Watchtower Society and the mental anguish that it is now causing me and my extended family.

    Baptism is a spiritual issue and I would like this situation resolved as such. Based on my understanding that being a Jehovah’s Witness identifies me as a representative of an unusual earthly organization rather than a worshiper of God I would like that identification to be completely erased, rather than to be considered disfellowshipped or disassociated and hence considered an ex Jehovah’s Witness forever more. I have sought legal advice in case my baptism is not annulled based on the spiritual reasons so far provided and will consider starting judicial proceedings if necessary.

    A secondary reason I am requesting an annulment rather than the easier alternative of disassociation is due to the defamation to my reputation that will result from being labeled as disassociated and the ongoing negative effect this will have for the remainder of my life. People that read the bible without preconceived notions understand that the Watchtower shunning policy is extended well beyond scriptural guidelines and is in fact closely aligned with methods used by cults and high control groups. The unchristian way in which the Watchtower Society uses shunning in manipulating its members is adversely affecting the lives hundreds of thousands of people and I do not wish for me or my family to be subjected to similar hardship. Neither do I wish untrue defamatory comments that appear in the Watchtower publications regarding those that no longer believe it is God’s organization to be applied to me. This includes statements that I am a person who is;
    * rebelling against Jehovah w93 10/1 p.19
    * presumptuous w80 8/1 p.20
    * loathsome, odious, filthy, to be hated and detested, w52 10/1 p.599
    * spreading lies and misinformation, siding with Satan w00 5/1 p.9
    * a self-seeking heretics not to even be greeted w83 4/1 p.24
    * a spiritual drunkards wallowing in doctrinal vomit w90 1/15 p.28

    In the United States of America the Watchtower Society has traditionally used “freedom of religion’ under the First Amendment Clause as its primary legal argument against being sued. Whilst this argument makes suing a religion difficult the courts do not look favorably on a religion that uses misinformation or coercive persuasion to indoctrinate or manipulate its members. A primary case for this is Molko v. Holy Spirit Association or the Unification of World Christianity (“Unification”).

    Above shows just a small fraction of the misinformation that appears in the Watchtower. The practices of the Watchtower Society are equally based on common methods of coercive persuasion. Dr. Margaret Singer specialises in coercive persuasion. I am not attempting to address whether the Watchtower Society is a cult but rather make the interesting comparison of Watchtower practice with a summary she has done on Robert J Lifton’s research into the coercive techniques used by cults. Lifton’s research was a result of a study he undertook of American prisoners of Communist China. Dr Singer summarises his eight indicators of a cult as follows;

    1. ENVIRONMENT CONTROL. Limitation of many/all forms of communication with those outside the group. Books, magazines, letters and visits with friends and family are taboo. "Come out and be separate!"

    2. MYSTICAL MANIPULATION. The potential convert to the group becomes convinced of the higher purpose and special calling of the group through a profound encounter / experience, for example, through an alleged miracle or prophetic word of those in the group.

    3. DEMAND FOR PURITY. An explicit goal of the group is to bring about some kind of change, whether it be on a global, social, or personal level. "Perfection is possible if one stays with the group and is committed."

    4. CULT OF CONFESSION. The unhealthy practice of self disclosure to members in the group. Often in the context of a public gathering in the group, admitting past sins and imperfections, even doubts about the group and critical thoughts about the integrity of the leaders.

    5. SACRED SCIENCE. The group's perspective is absolutely true and completely adequate to explain EVERYTHING. The doctrine is not subject to amendments or question. ABSOLUTE conformity to the doctrine is required.

    6. LOADED LANGUAGE. A new vocabulary emerges within the context of the group. Group members "think" within the very abstract and narrow parameters of the group's doctrine. The terminology sufficiently stops members from thinking critically by reinforcing a "black and white" mentality. Loaded terms and clichés prejudice thinking.

    7. DOCTRINE OVER PERSON. Pre-group experience and group experience are narrowly and decisively interpreted through the absolute doctrine, even when experience contradicts the doctrine.

    8. DISPENSING OF EXISTENCE. Salvation is possible only in the group. Those who leave the group are doomed.

    All eight points are readily applicable to the Watchtower Society.

    My baptism vow was entered into as a minor after being subjected to a lifetime of coercive persuasion and misinformation. Many precious years of my life have been wasted in pointless pursuits strongly promoted in conjunction with misinformation about the time of the end by the Watchtower Society, including three and a half years as a volunteer worker at the headquarters of the Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of Australia. Actions taken by xxx and associated Jehovah’s Witness brothers over the last twelve months, including unannounced visitations at night, amount to harassment and have caused significant emotional distress and resulted in medical appointments, current use of prescription medicine and a referral to a psychiatrist for religious induced stress. Any public announcement that I am “no longer one of Jehovah’s Witnesses” will most certainly exacerbate such conditions, particularly in regard to the shunning I am to receive from my extended family for the remainder of my life. Furthermore my businesses will suffer financially. Though courts do not inquire about the truthfulness of a belief, they do not look favorably upon religious induced cause and effect as described above, particularly when coercive persuasion and misinformation is used to aggrieve citizens.

    I do not wish to commence judicial proceedings. Nor do I wish to cause any undue trouble for any of Jehovah’s Witnesses. I do not wish to undermine the faith of people that are content to follow their religious beliefs. If a person actively seeks me out to enquire about my beliefs consistent application of ‘freedom of religion’ will allow me to discuss these matters. All that I request is to be considered as “one of the world” and left to establish a new life free from the manipulation of a highly legalistic organization. The only way for this to be possible is to either be left alone with a written guarantee of no further action from this day forward from any elders acting on behalf of the Watchtower Society in regards to any spiritual matter, or a letter that outlines the annulment of my baptism.

    I will not tolerate any announcement in regards to myself to be made in public about my standing as a Jehovah’s Witness and will sue each individual person involved in such an announcement. I understand and accept the elders of Parramatta congregation may feel the need to present a talk outlining the dangers of associating with non believers and those that have left the faith. I am also willing to accept the elders of Parramatta congregation talking to members of the congregation and naming me personally as one to be avoided as a person of the world, or even one whose baptism has been annulled.

    Kind Regards

  • SPAZnik
    SPAZnik

    Cool.

  • stillAwitness
    stillAwitness

    What is the title of that book written by Dr. Singer?

  • sixsixsixtynine
    sixsixsixtynine

    Wow, excellent letter. "Best of" quality for sure!

  • mustang
    mustang

    IN THEORY:

    If you were to 1) declare your self to be YOUR OWN RELIGION; and further 2) that your religion recognized that your JW baptism was annulled then you would have an interesting position IN THE USA. Your OWN RELIGION (the religion of JWFACTS) could also 3) deny your DF'ing as unscriptural, unholy or however else you see fit to view it.

    USA precedents show that a religion can have a RELIGIOUS TRIBUNAL (read that a JC!!!) and make decisions such as excommunication (read that DF'ing or even INVOLUNTARY DA'ing, that is not really performed by the DA'ing person but by the Church). Those RELIGIOUS TRIBUNAL decisions DO NOT come under SECULAR LAW, but rather fall under CHURCH LAW. Therefore the SECULAR COURTS DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION, as the Secular Courts don't do windows and don't do Church Law!!!

    This is the basic "judicial theory" under which WTS adopts a Church Law Shield and dodges any liability on DF'ing in the USA.

    So the SECULAR COURTS of the USA refuse to deal with an individual against a Church if it goes into the realm of Church Law; what do you think that they will do if faced with a matter of Church Law A vs. Church Law B???

    The SECULAR COURTS will not enter into such a realm of a religious cat-fight: this is God's problem, we're outta here!!!

    There is nothing preventing a person from forming their very own Church, with its own tenets, Articles of Faith and unique Church Laws.

    When you consider the principle of "equal protection under Law", your new Church ahs as much or as many rights as the Catholic Church or WTS or Islam or the Salivation Army or the "Second Church of the New Moonies".

    PS: once you have formed your own Church, you can take a lesson from the "pro's" in the religion racket and start a "501.c.3 engine" [did I get the right one?] and go Non-Prophet with the donations.

    Mustang

  • sixsixsixtynine
    sixsixsixtynine
    Salivation Army

  • cyber-sista
    cyber-sista

    This is a brilliant idea.

    Right now I am a successful fader, but if this changes I may use the annulment argument. Another point I have is that I was baptized before 85 and the vows were changed in 1985. I didn't agree to the new contract and much of the original contract (doctrines) have now been changed.

    cybs

  • DannyHaszard
    DannyHaszard

    Kudos from Danny,my formal DFing has it's advantages also as i can now hold them accountable for purging,outing me as a whistle-blower.

    They ain't gonna win

  • jwfacts
    jwfacts

    Stilla, this is a good intro site on cults. http://www.orange-papers.org/orange-cultinfo.html
    The two books it quotes that are well known works on cults are
    Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of "Brainwashing" in China, by Robert Jay Lifton, M.D.; W. W. Norton & Co., Inc., 1963.
    Cults in Our Midst: How They Capture Individuals, Families, and the Workplace by Margaret Thaler Singer with Janja Lalich, page 63.

    Mustang, good information. I have thought that if people are so gullible and if i can't beat the WTS I may as well join them. Register as a religion, con money out of a few suckers, get chauffer driven around the place, buy an apartment block overlooking Manhattan, and all tax free. But I just couldn't stoop that low.

  • Fatfreek
    Fatfreek

    Jwfacts,

    My heart aches for you and the anguish you've gone through lately. Most of us have gone through similar. We're with you.

    However, I'm puzzled. Unless I misread your post, did they not tell all from the platform that your are no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses? You said, "BTW - A few people have not understood if I am d/f or not, it seems the new announcement " XXX is no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses" is confusing the brothers."

    What's confusing? Blondie cited some WT publication, not long ago, where that is exactly the language they now use from the platform. They no longer say so-and-so is disfellowshipped. Or so-and-so has disassociated himself. They simply say that "so-and-so is no longer one of Jehovah's Witnesses?" Plain and simple, like it or not. I'm guessing that their legal team put them up to this less direct approach. You know, avoid the litigation thing. But that's just a guess.

    The audience then takes that new expression (a "coded" instruction to shun) and runs with it the same as with the old announcements. "That's our signal to shun so-and-so, as they wink-wink to each other". Just because others in the audience are confused about the announcement doesn't change the outcome.

    Not long ago, Seeker4 in his 500th post here detailed another excellent letter, by the way, not of disassociation but in a similar vein as yours. Check it out: http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/6/91719/1.ashx

    He suspected that since he'd been gone for more than ten years that they would leave him alone. We all rooted for him. However, he confirmed recently that they made the new announcement about him. I somewhat know his feelings as yours about this. It's not fair and I oughta take them to court for slandering my good name in public view. As Quotes learned less than a month ago, they have extremely deep pockets and a big team of built-in lawyers.

    Of course you can make overtures to the JW's you come in contact with. That's your right as a citizen of this fine country, no thanks to them. It's called free speech. And some of them may reciprocate. I think that's great, of course. But for the most of them who understand the new code, expect the shunning.

    Welcome, Jwfacts, to the club. We're always here for you, rain or shine.

    Fats

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit