Interesting piece of old WT history.
For decades, it was understood very clearly that in order to ever become an "evil slave" you had to first be an approved slave. For JW's that meant that you actually had to be recognized by the WT as a partaker or an "anointed one", and then fall away from the "truth" to become part of the evil slave class.
It was understood that ones that departed after Russell died, (Millenial Dawn) "Dawnites" were the original modern day evil slave. Also, when Rutherford stole the organization from the British guys (Johnson sticks in my mind) that they were the evil slave. Then of course, more to our day, Ray Franz was considered evil slave because of his departure. However, Dunlop and other who were not partakers were not considered evil slave. The pedophiles that left the GB were not considered evil slave.
I can't think of the exact statement in a more recent WT magazine, but in the 90's or later, there was an allusion to apostates leaving the organization and becoming evil slave. From their past definitions, that comment was totally wrong. Anyone know where that comment is?
An apostate by their definition would include any evil slave and also any non-anointed JW's that have left the organization over doctrinal issues.
However, they have left their own doctrines and it is a conundrum to me why they don't consider themselves both apostate and evil slave, I do.
u