I had begun to read Schnell's book when we first left - but in the 'fresh out of the borg' mental state, I had found it too caustic. Now I am reading it and find it quite interesting due to the time frame - In Judge Rutherford's era.
One of the premises that he states repeatedly in the book, took me by surprise. I would be curious if any could confirm/deny the reality of his accusations here. He states that as a 'Zone overseer' in Ohio in the late 30's, he was sent in to 'instigate' riots among a peaceful community near Youngstown. He insinuated that this was a fairly common occurance in those days.
I know that there were riots, and that some Witnesses were run out of town, some even tarred and feathered, others arrested. My point is this; Did the WTBTS, under the direction of the Judge, purposely put the witnesses out there as fodder in order to create these riots? Schnell claims that the Judge knew just what he was doing - picked the precise locations that he thought would lead to eventual court cases that would favor the witnesses, even to some of the Supreme Court victories. That once a community was 'stirred up' he would send in hundreds of witnesses to further agitate until it became a riot.
Did Rutherford do this with the intention of gaining sympathy for religious persecution, thus setting the stage for the many legal victories that put the witnesses in the place they are today? I find this accusation to be facinating.
Can anyone comment on this with firsthand knowledge? Or your perspective on Schnell's book?
Jeff