LittleToe & Kenneson,
True, comparing any two organisations one would find a number of commonality and differences. I think comparing is an effective tool for evaluation. We do it all the time. Making comparisons is a technique used in every field of science. A ‘comparison of two’ is limited compared with a ‘comparison of three or more”. Now if we add a third column to the list of parallels, a better observation is accessible. For example (common) Christianity, the parallels and differences become significant. To me the vast number of points of commonality is striking.
Believing that freemasonry had an influence on the WTS, I am not saying masonry actively influenced or even approved of this. That’s why I find it interesting that both societies deny any relation to each other.
The amount of indications (or evidence to me) that the WTS’ founder was mason does not necessarily reflect negatively on freemasonry.