Hi Richie and Jeremy: First Richie, you asked,
"I was df'd as an elder 1 1/2 years ago - Can I demand to have all of my files destroyed for whatever personal reason? What would the procedure be - do I really have to wait at least 5 years before they legally follow up on that? Please tell me the recourse to be taken."
I have been totally away and DA'd since 1995, but I stopped attending meetings in May 1992. So, I understand that today, according to some posters, that the Society discourages notes in the file except for the S-77 and S-79 Cards, and maybe the Pub Cards of the DF'd person. So, I am not totally equipped to respond according to today's procedures.
That said, were you to have approached me, about 9 years ago, when I was still an Elder, I would likely decline to remove or destroy any file materials until the 5 year limit expired for JC notes, and the 2 year limit on Pub. Cards. Once these time frames passed, I would have destroyed everything except your DF Card with a note as to who the original JC was. That information would be retained forever in the event you asked to be reinstated. It is needed to send back to the Society notifying them of reinstatement. [I might have kept your last Pub. Card anyway - they are designed front and back to cover two years - so as to have a record of your baptism date and last known address. But that would have been my own thing, and a Society directive. My motive would not be to be intrusive - but simply for my own convenience in the event you were reinstated, I would have some record to work with.]
Were I a DF'd Elder today, that is recently DF'd and wanted my file and all record of my involvemnent with the religion exponged and destroyed, I would see out an attorney and have him/her contact the Society and the local congregation to make the request. But, like the Catholic Church, I would not expect that I could ever get the Society to cooperate in such a request. And even when a person gets reinstated, it is my understanding that the Society keeps a record of their DF history FOREVER, even after the person is deceased.
Hope that helps.
Jeremy: Normally, Elders would never keep any file note on a person who was never baptized, unless you became an 'approved associate' and considered 'officially' and unbaptized Publisher. If you then, prior to baptism committed some sin, and met with the Elders, note might me made, and a file retained along with your Pub. Cards. But when I served as an Elder, we only had a a couple of cases of removing unbaptized Publishers from being approved associates, and I honestly do not recall keeping any file on them.
But, if you only studied and went to meetings, but never became involved in the School or Field Service, then I doubt any file would have ever been created. And even if you went to the Elders with some 'sin' they would counsel you, but not keep any record -- at least in my experience.
BUT - --- there is always a BUT ... LOL IF you had been known to rbing in 'apostate' influence, causing some to leave the organization, then I have no doubt a file would be created on you. I personally know a women who studied for a while while living in Washington State, and then she saw through the Watch Tower teachings, and read many books that exposed the flaws in the JW beliefs. She started a ministry to help JW women. She would attend meetings, agree to study, and have two or three JW women over, and then turn around the study, and would kindly introduce her points to them.
Over time she helped many JW women to leave the organization, including some Pioneer sisters. This alarmed the Elders, and they strongly asked her not to attend their Kingdom Hall anymore. She then tried another nearby Hall, and the Elders were able to get the JWs there to shun her. She tried yet another Hall, and the Elders barred her from attending meetings. The subsequent congregations to the first one were all tipped off that this women was influenced by 'apostate' thinking ... and she was effectively DF'd in a manner of speaking ... and I have absolutely no doubt that there is a file on her. But, that is an exception reather than a rule.
Amazing