One more welcome, friend Keo,
Reading your story was as if I were reading my own some years ago. You, however, express yourself far more eloquently. I believe that's a good sign because I believe (that's only me, mind you) that a person's eloquence somehow reflects the housekeeping inside his brain. Cluttered thoughts prevent us from clearly expressing ourselves. Again, just me.
I too, shuddered, at times when I'd go to the door with all the questionable issues laying on the back burner of my brain. What if they ask me this question or that question?
Finally, I could bear it no longer. I decided that if I could find the answer to a single question, all those other obstacles would probably fall into place. I then isolated everything down to one issue -- the principle of honesty. Was there evidence that the Society, in it's own written pages, was guilty of such a pre-meditated, egregious act? If so, I reasoned to myself, it would go a long way toward knowing that they'd truly crossed the line.
There came to be many issues, documented from their very own pages that proved their lack of honesty but one in particular stands out. The predicted and failed date of 1925. See what you think as you browse the following letter that was never mailed to the governing body:
http://users.oeccwildblue.com/millerlr/DearMother.pdf
Fats