As for being permanently damaged because they have to live with what they have done - I take the stand that they are already damaged and therefore, the ramifications of what they have done can never truly affect them as they would in a 'normal' person.
Examine your logic. One cannot be damaged by the horror of having killed one's children if one has not killed one's children.
As for being damaged beforehand by having had serious depression or episodes of mental illness, well.....ok. But once they are back to 'normal', then of course they are going to react like a 'normal' person who had a mental illness and the trauma associated with it.
I'm not sure what you want from the mentally ill? I wish they'd just be 'normal' too. It would solve so many problems in this world.
Take a sociopath.
Why?
We know nothing about what her mental illness or their lifestyle did to the kids, we don't know how affectionate she was or was not, we don't know much about her mothering at all.
I suppose not, but the jury does.
One child murdered by a sick pedophile is no less or important than the 5 children that she murdered and in both cases, mental illness prevails.I guess I still don't see your point. If you think I take my positions because of the relative value of different kids, you are projecting some sick shit on me. I don't accept it. If you are going to persist in comparing a mom suffering from psychotic delusions to a sexual predator who kills to cover his crimes, I think you are an unfeeling, cold, and frankly, not very logical...... person.