I believe I read one of your posts the other night, and you mentioned only 2 things are required... Faith and Love
I think that was lovelylil. It wasn't my post. The following are required for becoming an unbaptized publisher:
(1) Ceasing all worldly habits that would detract from the message or appear as hypocrisy.
(2) Regularly attending all Christian Meetings for as long as the local congregation elders deem necessary.
The following are required BEFORE baptism (counting the above two as prerequisites for the second step):
(1) An extensive period of Bible Study, lasting at least many weeks.
(2) Qualifying as an unbaptized publisher (see #1 and #2 above) and monthly reporting a regular share in the ministry for as long as the local elders deem necessary.
(3) Repentance and Conversion (as far as I know, the only Scriptural requirement).
(4) Prayer of dedication.
(5) Extensive demonstration of Bible knowledge to congregation elders.
In Chapter 18 of the book "What Does the Bible Really Teach?" paragraph four makes this comment: " To qualify for baptism, however, you must take definite steps."
Therefore, these steps are taught to new ones as pre-baptismal requirements. Since these are listed in a book entitled "What Does the Bible Really Teach?" I am simply asking where the Scriptures are to support a doctrine that these are requirements for Christian baptism.
If the doctrine is not supported Scripturally, what is its origin? (1 John 4:1)
Does not the society not have any leg room to ensure this?
Scripturally? No. Galatians 1:6-9 is pretty specific when it comes to adding to the good news Christ gave and that the apostles taught. Organizationally, they have repeatedly demonstrated they have unlimited leg room to decide whatever they want, whenever they want. But their exercise of authority isn't Scriptural.
Think about this: If a church of Christendom teaches a doctrine as truth, with the best of intentions, but the doctrine is not based on the Bible, is it a Scriptural doctrine? If it is not in harmony with what the Scriptures say, is it part of the pattern of heathful words? If not, where does it come from?
Now, fairmindedly apply the exact same standard to Jehovah's Witnesses.
Respectfully,
AuldSoul