We've upset someone!!

by fullofdoubtnow 25 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • fullofdoubtnow
    fullofdoubtnow
    Perhaps a way around this would be to repost the article but rewritten to provide thorough references/ sources, using the Watchtowers own words to hang them.

    Hi Gadget,

    We are thinking along those lines ourselves. Trev will be rewriting the article in the next few days, with full references, and will probably contact the admin team before posting it. If they ok it, it goes back on the site. If not, he has a few other ideas, but we'll try the original article, written in a slightly differrent way but with the same information, first.

  • Gadget
    Gadget
    If they ok it, it goes back on the site. If not, he has a few other ideas

    If they won't let you repost it, i could probably host it for you. Depending on how its linked up people might not even notice its on a different site.

  • fullofdoubtnow
    fullofdoubtnow

    Thanks Gadget,

    If we have any problems with our site administrators, we 'll be in touch. It's not as if there is anything untrue about what Trev wrote, but if we back it up with references, and get it back on the site, we'll see what the jws response is then.

    Linda

  • juni
    juni

    Hi Linda and Trev,

    Shows how much work goes into keeping up these sites.

    Best to both of you in your endeavors to help others.

    Hugs,

    Juni

  • fullofdoubtnow
    fullofdoubtnow
    Shows how much work goes into keeping up these sites.

    Hi juni,

    That's the main reason Trev agreed to take the article down. He's angry at having to do so, but has put a lot of work into building the site, and didn't want it all to disappear, especially as it is getting so many hits at the moment. He has plans to put a lot more on their in the next few months, so keep checking it out. One of his ex elder friends has done some of the writing, he wrote "Jeffrey's page", where there is only one article at the moment, but there will be more soon, and thought of the quiz question. I don't know if you have looked at that, but some have, and we've had some odd responses, to say the least! Actually,it's a one - word answer, and there are 3 possibilities, depending on who might be making the statement! Check it out lol.

    Linda

  • AlanF
    AlanF

    Thanks for posting the article. Yes, it would be a good idea to rewrite the article with documentation. There are several things that should be phrased better, in the sense of more accurately. You might field the rewrite to some posters you respect for their input, before you host it again.

    AlanF

  • fullofdoubtnow
    fullofdoubtnow
    You might field the rewrite to some posters you respect for their input, before you host it again.

    Thanks Alan, that's a really good idea.

    I think Trev will probably do the rewrite this weekend, and putting it on here first for you guys to look at is a good way to test the water, so to speak, before we take it to the site admin. One of us will post it once it's re written.

  • candidlynuts
    candidlynuts

    thanks for the link Linda, trev and your site is really nice. keep up the good work!

  • fullofdoubtnow
    fullofdoubtnow

    Thanks, Candidly. Trev does nearly all the work, and I haven't been too involved up to now, but intend to get more involved from now on. He is planning another article at the moment now he's home, and will probably put it up later, so keep visiting - if it's annoying the jws, we'll keep writing!

  • Dansk
    Dansk
    if it's annoying the jws, we'll keep writing!

    What do you mean 'IF'? LOL!!

    Love,

    Ian

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit