As far as I am concerned I am sure it will all pan out in the end thats why I am a "pan Millenialist"
That is a funny one! Haven't heard that position taught in any seminaries before.
I would like to add a few thoughts to the thread. First of all, it is understandable why there is strong feeling on the subject given the fact that many of you spent years of your life "preaching" the coming destruction of all but the JWs. You believed this was the biblical view because you were being "fed" the "truth" by the WT. However, as I have stated in previous posts, the WT took delight in twisting the scriptures to present their own agenda: join us OR ELSE! They used Armaggedon as the "carrot" (as was previously referred to): you better be faithful OR ELSE! And when you had questions or doubts, they told you to be quiet OR ELSE! You lived your lives on the edge, constantly being told "any day now", when they had been saying this for over a century. The Bible talks about "hope deferred makes the heart sick" and so some of you burned out or became depressed or sick under the beatings of an evil, not a faithful, slave. So, I offer the following thoughts, knowing that many of you do not want to read any more about the "end times", but just wanting to provide more info on the topic. I also realize that the varying views presented are an area where the WT despises "Christendom" for lack of unity in beliefs.
As far as understanding what Christianity teaches outside the WT, the differences boil down to methods of hermeneutics (or how the Scripture is interpreted) and the also your view of the authority/accuracy of the Bible. I did a quick search and found this summary online and maybe it will be helpful (or maybe it will just add to the confusion!) at
http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/000900.html :
"There is no area of Christian theology more contentious or confusing than eschatology, the study of the end times. Should the Book of Revelation be interpreted literally or metphorically? Will Christ establish his Kingdom on earth or has his millenial reign already begun? While evangelicals differ on many of these issues there is a general agreement on three particular points:
1. Jesus Christ will return to earth one day.
2. There will be a bodily resurrection of all people who have ever lived.
3. There will be a final judgment in which believers join Christ for eternity while nonbelievers are separated from God?s presence.*
How this occurs, though, is an issue of great debate. One of the central issues involves the millennium, the thousand-year period during which Christ is said to rule the world. (Revelation 20:1-10). The four most popular views are dispensational premillenialism, historical premillenialism, amillenialism, and postmillennialism.
Dispensational premillenialism is the view that Jesus will return to remove the church from the world in an event known as the rapture. Theories differ on whether the rapture will occur before, in the middle of, or after a seven year period called the tribulation (pre-trib, mid-trib, post-trib). These events will culminate in a literal thousand year rulership of Christ when peace will reign, the natural world will no longer be cursed, and evil will be suppressed. A final rebellion, however, will break out which will end in God crushing evil forever, judging the resurrected, and establishing heaven and hell.
The following beliefs are features of dispensational premillenialism:
Proponents of this view include: Dallas Theological Seminary, Tim LaHaye (author of the Left Behind series), and Pat Robertson.
Historical premillenialism is the belief that Christ will return "before the millennium" in order to resurrect the saints (the "first resurrection"), establish his rule from Jerusalem over the rebellious nations (the battle of Armageddon), and usher in a thousand year period of material peace and prosperity; at the end of this period the nations (still in natural bodies) will rebel and make war against Christ and the resurrected saints (the battle of Gog and Magog), who will be saved by fire from heaven, followed by the second resurrection??now of unbelievers??and the final judgment
The following are features of historic premillennialism:
Proponents include George Eldon Ladd, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, and the early church fathers (e.g., Ireneaus, Polycarp, Justin Martyr).
Amillenialism is the belief that the millennial kingdom is indeterminate in length and fulfilled by Christ currently ruling in heaven. At the end of this reign Christ will come back to gather the church and judge the nations.
The following are features of amillennialism:
^Some amils are preterists, believing that many of the prophecies (including the one about the antichrist) have already been fulfilled (usually in 70AD).
Proponents of this view include Augustine, Martin Luther, and John Calvin.
Postmillenialism is the belief that Christ?s second coming will follow the millennium which will itself be ushered in by the spiritual and moral influence of Christian preaching and teaching in the world.
The following are features of postmillennialism:
The Messianic kingdom was founded on earth during the earthly ministry of Christ, in fulfillment of Old Testament prophecy and making the New Testament church the transformed Israel.
At this point there are two types of postmillennialists. Pietistic postmillennialists deny that the postmillennial advance of the kingdom involves the total transformation of culture through the application of biblical law. Theonomic postmillennialists affirm this.
An extended period of great spiritual prosperity may endure for millennia, after which history will come to an end by the personal, visible, bodily return of Christ accompanied by a literal resurrection and a general judgment, which ushers in the final and eternal form of the kingdom.
Postmillennialism was popular during the 18th and 19th centuries and is popular with many mainline denominations. Few evangelicals, however, hold this view of eschatology.
* Boyd and Eddy, Across the Spectrum
**All points listed as features are from R.C. Sproul, The Last Days According to Jesus"
I myself am a dispensational premillenialist, and I believe that the return of Israel to the land was a partial fulfillment of prophecy (BTW, Russell and Rutherford also originally belived in the restoration of the nation of Israel, Rutherford even travelled to and preached in Jerusalem. A Golden Age magazine described this trip and several books were written promoting this view. Those Jews that he "converted" must have been confused by the "new light" that later said this was a demonic teaching)
Another thing is that I believe the WT also is fulfilling prophecy as one of the signs of end: false teachers. A number of different cult groups arose in the late 1800's. I found some information from : http://www.realanswers.tv/answers/answers05.html
Does the Bible say anything about churches growing cold in the nearing of the return of Christ? |
This is a common question by those who believe in the “Pre-Millennial / Pre-Tribulation Rapture” view of End Times. Common Millennial Views:
Common Tribulation Views:
Pastor Yandian’s teaching follows the Pre-Millennial / Pre-Tribulation model. I urge you to study his book, Understanding the END TIMES ( booktape ). His thorough presentation of the scriptural basis for this view, and his response to the opposing positions, will give you a great understanding of the subject.
In this passage the false teachers are referred to as “antichrists.” Notice, this is not the Antichrist ( tape ). John tells us their presence shows that it is “ a ” last day (again not the Last Day). The significance is that there are many events in this age called the “Last Days” that are confirmations of His soon coming return, but they are not the immediate event. They are to be an encouragement to us—a witness to His Promise.
These Christians were losing hope in the return of the Lord—and the restoration of all they had lost—because it hadn’t happened as they thought (or were incorrectly taught).
This brings us to our next point. If there are false Teachers, there will be followers.
These verses show us that the false teachers are inspired by Satan himself, through demonic influences, and their purpose is to lead believers astray—to distract them from the mission of the Church. Also, we see that their arrival is desired by those who are looking for new and different things, people who are tired of the “standard” set forth in the Word of God. Their “itching ears” will be filled with the diluted truth ( error ) taught by false teachers. Does this add anything of value to the thread? TS |