Seeing as I have the WT in front of me today, I thought you'd enjoy the Questions from Readers from the February 15, 2007 article on the evils and pagan origins on toasting or clinking of glasses. The article specifically mentions how not everything today that was of pagan origin is necessarily bad, and sites "wedding rings" as being of pagan origin, but it's not viewed like that now. Then, incredibly, they go on and say that while toasting might not be considered a religious practice today, there's "good reason" for Christians to avoid it------without giving any valid reason why other than: Do as we say:
QUESTIONS FROM READERS----CHECK THIS OUT!
by Mary 87 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
-
-
unique1
I didn't know Witnesses couldn't toast and I was in for 24 years. Just wierd that me and my friends missed that. Now that I think about it thought, I was never at a wedding where there was a toast, guess that was why.
What stood out to me here was the use of the word probably. It probably was pagan. So. A lot of thing probably were pagan. If you have no proof then why make a big deal about it? Oh yeah, cause they can.
-
-
-
NewYork44M
I always loved the anouncement I would hear at jw weddings: "the wedding party has requested that there will be NO clinking of glasses."
-
-
-