"probably" is a buzzword meaning "The Bible does not say but since we are the FDS we can add to the Bible."
Blondie
by Mary 87 Replies latest jw friends
Remember when they first published the "new" elder arrangement?
They blithely published right in the watchtower that "the bible seems to indicate a rotation of the elder positions"...without a clue as to how and where it "seems" to indicate this.
Not long after, the powers that be effectively said "stop the rotation".
Wonder if the bible "seems" to indicate that as well?
For other great examples of this kind of duplicity, just check out the threads today on sex practices.
After a recent discussion of this & similar topics with a faithful jw, her reply was that maybe jah uses issues like this to identify our heart conditions in regards to his organization.
So, anyone choosing to question god's organization and the fds can quickly be identified as apostate and therefore be shunned.
It's all about impression management: Anything to make them stand apart as different from others, regardless of whether it's a scriptural injunction or not.
I love the way the article cites a verse from the Hebrew Scriptures which has nothing to do with the topic at hand, but creates the impression the topic is based squarely on scripture. Oh the duplicity of the FDS and the thick-headedness of the rank and file who carry on so indiffferent to the duplicity.
Uh-Oh - Time to ban handshakes, too:
Mithras was worshipped as guardian of arms, and patron of soldiers and armies. The handshake was developed by those who worshipped him as a token of friendship and as a gesture to show that you were unarmed. When Mithras later became the Roman god of contracts, the handshake gesture was imported throughout the Mediterranean and Europe by Roman soldiers.