Comparison: When I held a middle management position at my former place of employment, I used to have to meet clients with some of our sales staff. Usually this would be done while taking the client out to lunch. When I was married, I'd always tell my wife about these meetings beforehand. Why? About 80% of our sales staff was female, and you know the whole JW routine. I just wanted to make sure she knew ahead of time when I'd be at one of these lunch meetings--especially when it was with a female workmate or client. She never expressed a single problem with this whatsoever. She never imagined anything might be going on with me and any of these women--and nothing was.
But one day something happened: A little, old brother from our Kingdom Hall noticed me at one of these lunch meetings. Then he mentioned to his wife that he saw me at lunch, and one of the people I was with was a woman. Then his wife called my wife about it.
Had anything changed? No. I was still at a business lunch meeting--just like I'd been fifty or more times over a number of years. But somehow the fact that other people were talking about it caused an unexpected reaction from my wife.
SHE: "Who was the woman you were at lunch with today?"
ME: "Ruth Hansen. You remember? I told you about it this morning."
SHE: "Oh..." (She knows I did, but she's still scowling.) "Why'd you hafta go to lunch anyway?"
ME: "Huh? Are you kidding? That's what we do. The salesperson and the creative director (me) take the client to lunch, thank them for the business and get their ideas on how we can meet their advertising goals. I've been doing this for years; you know that."
SHE: "Well, Albert Alvarez saw you through the window today--with her."
ME: "Right. With her--and with him--the client. So?"
You see, it didn't matter that nothing had changed. It didn't matter that she'd been fully informed. It didn't matter that nothing AT ALL was going on between me and this salesperson. It didn't matter that this had gone on for years and years...
The only thing that mattered is that someone had said something about it. People were talking about it.
Anyone who has listened to Don Imus over the forty years he's been on the air knows he says stuff like this all the time. Strike that. I'd say he says things that are often more potentially offensive or irritating than what he said the other day. He's not a politician or a newsman; he's an entertainer--recognized as one of the very earliest "shock jocks."
How does something like this happen? Here's another question: When did people first start thinking it was all right to call women in general, "hos"? Think back fifteen or twenty years ago. Did you ever hear people (let's say non-JWs) refer to just any woman as a whore? I'd say the only time was when we were talking about an actual prostitute--or at least a woman with very low moral standards. Again where did people first begin using "ho" so widely? Wasn't it with many in the Rap Music culture?
I couldn't believe it when I heard my own daughter start referring to women and girls as hos. She did it laughingly, and she was certainly not actually calling them "whores." She'd call her friend a ho, and they'd both laugh. I don't know. I don't like it, but have to admit I also became a bit desensitized to its use. Again, I don't like the idea that rappers and the entertainment companies that promote them continue to churn out product that, among other things, is often incredibly disrespectful to women--to say the least. But if everyone else (including lots of women) seem to have accepted "ho" as some cute, new word to be used lightly about females in general--or when you're joking around...fine. Stuff like this happens within languages all the time as they evolve. I repeat, I don't really like it--but there are only so many battles you can take on.
But while I've made a certain amount of peace with it, I do recognize where this desensitizing began, and it wasn't with Don Imus. If rappers can call women "bitches" and "hos" all day long, why is there no widely publicized attempt to get them fired from their contracts--or for boycotts of the record labels who promote them? Freedom of Speech? That's cool.
But where is Don Imus' Freedom of Speech?
For many years, a colonial woman could pick herbs and make natural remedies for her family's ailments. Then one day someone in her village wonders out loud if she isn't a "witch," making magical potions. People start talking, eyes get wide, fingers point, and in the ensuing mania she is put to death for "practicing witchcraft."
For many years, one of Jehovah's Witnesses could respectfully express his minor differences about Watchtower doctrine. Then one day, in a changed Watchtower climate, someone in his Kingdom Hall decides he doesn't like these comments. People start talking, eyes get wide, fingers point, and in the ensuing mania he is disfellowshipped and shunned as an "apostate."
For forty years, like many rappers, Don Imus exercised his Freedom of Speech in a little entertainment corner. Some people liked him, a lot of people didn't--so they didn't listen. Then one day Al Sharpton decided to single him out. People start talking, eyes get wide, fingers point, and all of a sudden people think this is a case of a man hatefully accusing a team of young ladies of being whores--when it's just a radio goofball, joking around. And in the ensuing mania he becomes a pariah, is accused of "racial hatred," and is fired.
What about Howard Stern, Lenny Bruce, Richard Pryor, Andrew Dice Clay? We can go on and on. Comedian Carlos Mencia loves to have fun with racial issues--and calls women "hos" all the time. Should he be fired by HBO? Awwww, but he's just joking around, right? Well so was Don Imus. You say you don't like this type of humor? I understand; lots of people don't like it. You may prefer humor that is more wholesome and that strives not to offend. Good for you. But lots of people do like this up-front, no-holds-barred brand of humor--and it's been protected pretty well for many years.
You don't have to like the idea of someone calling girls "nappy headed hos." But if you decide to stand up against it, you have to apply your accusations fairly or you're a hypocrite. Al Sharpton's and Jesse Jackson's call for the firing of Don Imus, while taking no such strong action toward rap stars and others who use this language (and worse) makes them hypocrites.