You need to keep in mind that these guys know the difference between an active Witness and a 'troulemaker'. They see alot of mail and know who is who.
Your letter was good, but probably the paragraph toward the end used terminology that would suggest that you are not presently a Witness, yet the surrounding paragraphs use terminology that suggest you are, therefore giving away that you might be behaving "deceptively".
I thank you in advance for helping me to reconcile this apparent contradiction of beliefs, taught and published by you and generally held by all the Jehovah's Witnesses vs. your relationship or association status - as Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, with theUnfortunately, the average Witness letter will likely be very basic, almost dumb. So if you phrased your question with Witness-like simplicity, you would have gotten too simple of an answer. Being informed and very specific, you make it difficult for them to dictate the content of their reply because you have listed specifically the questions you want answered. But this is good though.
United Nations.
After all, it is still clear in my mind, when I personally , to my family and in private , in the congregation and even publicly , I did refer to the "…United Nations as ' a scarlet-colored wild beast ' that is the image of Satan's bloodstained political system…"
I doubt this person will correspond further by email, but he has stated that he will address you if you write him, so I suggest doing that, and doing so in the near future by means of registered mail or courier.
As far as identifying you from what you write here, it is unlikely they can admit anything that would give away that they monitor sites like this. Further, if they do monitor these sites, such monitoring would be limited to a very few persons and most likely that would be for purposes of 'strategy' in determining where we are going with issues like this.
Path