Another unprecedented fact is the secrecy about the sites themselves. Why were the sites of all the planes kept so secret? Why were cameras from the hotel accross from the pentagon not revealed to the public? Why were gag orders put on firemen who were at the towers? Why wasn't the media allowed to go into ground zero? Again, I'm not saying I believe in the theories. I'm just asking questions. Still, some of you seem really defensive. What's that about? Is it more of a political issue for you? I'm willing to let my mind go where you all are not willing to even consider for a second. Why?
So who moved Ockham's Razor? interesting take on 9/11 conspiracy theories
by coffee_black 56 Replies latest social current
-
Shawn10538
It's his condescending tone I didn't appreciate, not his "logic."
-
coffee_black
ninja, I will ask him...in fact, if anyone else has questions you'd like me to ask list them here and I'll bring the list with me. Should be an interesting conversation.
shawn10538 I think you are over reacting. Funky derek was just answering you point by point. Your response to him in any event was far harsher than his toward you. Lighten up! It's an interesting topic... we can all learn something here.
Coffee
-
stillajwexelder
Why were the sites of all the planes kept so secret? Why were cameras from the hotel accross from the pentagon not revealed to the public? Why were gag orders put on firemen who were at the towers? Why wasn't the media allowed to go into ground zero?
It was a crime scene and thus sub judice
-
coffee_black
Ok.... I'll be going to the CSI dinner tonight... any more questions you'd like me to ask?
Coffee
-
ninja
why arent the videos from around the pentagon being shown now?.....is it still being treated as a crime scene?......it would keep all of us conspiracy theorists quiet.......and you governmental conspiracy theorists happy....he he
-
ninja
have a listen to popular mechanics on the charles goyette show debunking the "myths" of 9/11....or do they?
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Feature-Article.htm?InfoNo=009309 -
coffee_black
I'll ask him Ninja...but I'm not sure he'll have the answer to that one. His area of expertise is the structural failure aspect of it. Control of a crime scene is not what he does. He's an engineer.
Coffee
-
5go
OK my turn to chime in a Ockham's razor actualy favors certain theorist not the building collasped with explosives ones but the government lack of reaction ones.
How do you explain the lack of any reaction what so ever despite their being protcols for such a senario ( yes they really did think of it even tom clancy wrote a book on it and he is exCIA) . This despite a wargame going on the same day wargaming the very senario going on. Also no jets sent to intercept depite washington (the most protected airplace in the world) being overflown.
Explain that in simple terms.
Some one explained like this if there is a fire and it is already out of control you would still send firemen. On 9/11 no firemen ( F-15 or F16 jets ) were dispatched period at all until it was totally over! Yeah there might of been a slim chance but you still try!
-
hillary_step
OK my turn to chime in a Ockham's razor actualy favors certain theorist not the building collasped with explosives ones but the government lack of reaction ones.
HS