Videos I took of Chemtrails over my city

by What-A-Coincidence 36 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  mkr32208

  crazy...
• 

  heathen

  I believe there's something to it since the illuminati are very open about their desire to kill off a huge chunk of mankind . I get that from alex jones tho who says they are out to get us everyday of the week on his web broadcast. This is the same government that conspicuously had the NORAD pilots running drills about terrorists hitting the world trade centers on 911. I mean come on people , what do we need here for a wake up call?
• 

  What-A-Coincidence

  This is how I see it

  Governments/Mass Media = Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses

  lies, deceits, cover-ups, manipulations

  Question Everything ... did we not learn from our past?
• 

  MissingLink

  Is Ron Paul big in the USA Trailer Parks?

  Reminds me of one of my favorite "Dead Milkmen" Songs --

  Now Stuart, if you look at the soil around any large U.S. city with a big
  underground homosexual population - Des Moines, Iowa, perfect example.
  Look at the soil around Des Moines, Stuart. You can't build on it, you
  can't grow anything in it. The government says it's due to poor farming.
  But I know what's really going on, Stuart. I know it's the queers.
  They're in it with the aliens. They're building landing strips for gay
  Martians. I swear to God.
  
  You know what Stuart, I like you. You're not like the other people, here
  in the trailer park.
• 

  jayhawk1

  George Noory (Coast to Coast AM) has people on his radio show all the time talking about Chemtrails. I admit it is odd seeing a crossing pattern in the sky over SE Kansas in the middle of nowhere.

  Has anyone ever seen a nearly square cloud before? I have.
• 

  What-A-Coincidence

  jayhawk - That is exactly where I 1st heard it from. Then I googled it. How many goddam matrix's are there?
• 

  freydi

  Scientists Suspect Link Between Pesticides and Type 2 Diabetes
  
  Submitted by kat on January 28, 2008 - 11:48am.
  Why did we ever think that a pesticide that poisons bugs wouldn’t be harmful to humans, too? A just-published study from British medical journal the Lancet finds that people whose blood levels contain high levels of a category of pesticides known as POPs (persistent organic pollutants) are at greater risk of developing insulin resistance, which can lead to type 2 diabetes. More research is needed, according to Dr. Oliver Jones, one of the study’s authors:
  “Of course correlation does not automatically imply causation. But if there is indeed a link, the health implications could be tremendous. At present there is very limited information. Research into adult onset diabetes currently focuses on genetics and obesity; there has been almost no consideration for the possible influence of environmental factors such as pollution.”
  The researchers found that thin people with higher concentrations of POPs in their blood were more likely to get diabetes than overweight people whose POP levels were low. This is huge (as it were); obesity has largely been blamed for the dramatic rise in adult-onset diabetes, which we’ve renamed type 2 diabetes now that it’s showing up in kids, too. If environmental pollution turns out to be a factor, the pesticide industry had better brace itself for a new level of scrutiny.
  One of the POPs turning up in our blood is DDT, banned in the seventies. Government authorities continued to allow DDT to be widely used as an agricultural pesticide for decades after evidence that farmers regularly exposed to it suffered all kinds of illnesses, including a high rate of asthma. Unfortunately, POPs linger so long in our environment that DDT and other compounds in this category still find their way into our food chain, and, therefore, our bodies, where they “can persist in body fat for very long periods of time following exposure,” according to Science Daily.
  Rachel Carson warned us about DDT back in 1962 in Silent Spring, her ground-breaking (or, rather, earth-saving) exposé on DDT’s destruction of wildlife and potential harm to humans. Carson’s book is largely credited with launching the environmental movement, but sometimes it seems as though we’re just treading water—much of it tainted with PCB’s or agricultural runoff or plastic bags and other man-made debris.
  
  Here we are, forty-five years later, still battling with the residues of these persistent poisons. Makes you wonder about all the chemicals our industries use so freely in the production of our gotta-have consumer goods, including our foods. We need to understand two things, here: (1) a corporation’s primary responsibility is to the health of its bottom line, not the health of the people who buy its products; (2) the government agencies that are supposed to protect American consumers have a long history of favoring business interests over our health and safety.
  Our standards are far less stringent than the European Union’s when it comes to the use of many chemicals in consumer goods. Even China—China!—has higher standards for some products than we do, which is why they make a grade of formaldehyde-laced plywood for Home Depot that’s too toxic for their own market.
  
  Organic food sales have skyrocketed in the US in part because so many of us are willing to pay more for produce that’s pesticide-free. Sadly, those who can’t afford to pay more may be paying a price in other ways. Our out-of-whack eco-system raises a simple question: Who you callin’ “pest?”
  Originally posted on TakePart.com. http://www.eatingliberally.org/
  
  story__scientists_suspect_link_between_pesticides_and_type_2_diabetes_jan_28_2008_id824.