If you're no longer associated you're instantly viewed as "off limits" to any dub with a modicum of loyalty to the borg. I was in for 28 years, elder for 14 and was highly respected by hundreds in this area as I was "semi-prominent". (kinda like being "semi-professional"?) I crave to be able to talk with so many I have deep affection for. I managed to avoid DFing (as far as I know). But when we sent out letters to all those we had been close to, some for decades, regarding how I was being "hunted" by the elders because I had the gumption to speak confidentially to one person about the UN affair, and then provided all details of the UN matter with an accompanying evidence packet in the letter, the lack of response was disturbing. One sister to whom I had been very close told me I was "dangerous". One emailed us to say how hurt she was that we were trying to "destroy her faith". Another wrote an email that was an attempt to empathize, but simply attributed my position to "bad treatment" I had received. Out of over 50 letters we sent, not one, I repeat, not oneperson responded in any way to the issue that was the focal point of the letter. Now these were all people that I had felt we were very close to for 10, 20 and even 30 years. I realize this is not the approach Hassan recommends. It was kind of a sledgehammer. But at the time I felt my DFing was imminent and that this was my last opportunity to warn them. Out of over 50 people, not even one wanted to either (a.) take issue with the points in my letter; or (b.) express concern over the issues I raised.
It's true, someone who is an active elder can use that deception to have some effect, but I have a problem with the ethics of that method. I don't believe the end justifies the means. In the end, the ones who stay in do so by choice. We know they've been conned, as we were. And we really want to help them. Especially if we had a share in getting them involved or in encouraging them to stay loyal when we were in. To that end I do feel we have a responsibility to discharge. Whether it's paying them a visit (which we also tried with a few) or writing them a letter, I think we owe them that. But if they refuse to respond, we can't force them.
If someone finds a method that works, even with only a 10% success rate, I think their thread will be the most heavily viewed in the history of this forum. And I will salute them. But the dark side is strong.