What is the HIDDEN purpose of the Watchtower corporation?

by Terry 43 Replies latest watchtower bible

  • Terry
    Terry

    Why does the average man or woman on the street only have a vague awareness of who Jehovah's Witnesses are and what they stand for? Isn't it weird they know next to nothing after over a hundred years of door to door work???

    Ask yourself why this has been such an ineffective ministry.

    One actor, Tom Cruise, has raised more awareness about his own religion (Scientology) than all the Watchtower magazines placed at a million households. In Cruise's case, it is behavior that attracted attention.

    In the case of the Watchtower, the bad behaviors (death due to refused blood) only paints the Society as martyrs, albeit fantatical.

    The actual MESSAGE of what Jehovah's Kingdom means is completely lost to the public.

    Could it be because all this work is designed to do is imitate a process of delivering an important life-saving message?

    Could it be because the real purpose of the Watchtower corporation is hidden intentionally?

    Corporations acquire legitimacy by earning a profit. In the case of a religious corporation the "profit" must not appear as mere monetary gain. There has to be a public service aspect to generating millions of dollars that will escape taxation! Ordinary corporations must demonstrate to the Board of Directors that cash flow is equitable to investors and a justifiable return on investment has been made. The Watchtower Corporation has had to generate a kind of marvelous "machine" you could pour money into and make it disappear in the form of the preaching work.

    CONSTANT EXPANSION is the key! This is a kind of maniacal pyramid scheme to grow and grow ahead of the curve of waves of $$$.

    Watchtower rank-and-file members are used as volunteer labor staying very busy appearing to be doing something important.

    What they are really doing is generating publicity which serves to hide the actual purpose of the Watchtower corporation.

    What is the genuine purpose of the Watchtower corporation?

    POWER INVESTMENT!

    REAL ESTATE!

    The Watchtower was a corporate Donald Trump. It could grow dollars and not have to pay taxes on them. It could point to a worldwide work as evidence of money well spent (which wasn't really "spent" at all.) It could account for the cash flow by pointing to new projects in development and new acquisitions ostensibly for more and more publishing effort.

    But, in reality, the goose just kept laying golden eggs in the nest of Governing Body members.

    To the rank and file there was no Bill of Rights. They could be worked to death grinding out book and magazine sales. In fact, they had no choice but to comply since their very identity as Jehovah's Witnesses depended on demonstrations of door to door sales and hours devoted.

    But, why should they?

    There was a gun placed to the head of every Jehovah's Witness in the form of Armageddon. This threat could only seem real enough if Armageddon was made a fresh threat and not a vague one in the distant future.

    Any Jehovah's Witness who didn't fear being slaughtered at Armageddon just wasn't paying attention. Failure to comply with the busy-busy work commanded from Brooklyn headquarters would lead to disfellowshipping. Disfellowshipping would lead to having a big target placed on the ex-JWs back at Armageddon.

    It was the perfect "Protection Racket" organized crime had used to intimidate shopkeepers in the Al Capone era.

    Further, every once and awhile a GOING OUT OF BUSINESS SALE would have to be run. This would be in the form of date-setting.

    Date-setting (determining when Armageddon was to arrive) was an Investment.

    The publicity was golden. The threat level was heightened. The cash flow was extraordinary. The need for more investment property increased. The grip of absolute power was made real.

    The downside was practically nil!!

    Whatever number of members who balked and left in disgust; the upside was greater! How so?

    1.Only the "weaker" members would leave and that is no loss at all.

    2.The disfellowshipping would serve as a warning to other members and make threats appear very real.

    3.An outside body of “apostates” could be created as a target for vilification that served to drain off anger as a target away from the Governing Body itself. This apostate group would feel the brunt of frustrations and not the actual perpetrator's of date-setting fraud.

    4.A mindset of cognitive dissonance would be reinforced because anybody who stayed would have to justify being made a fool of for believing in the Faithful and Discreet Slave nonsense in the first place.

    5.Any slowdown in the worldwide conversions would be a bonus since it would "signal the end" of the preaching work was drawing near and that would mean Armageddon really was imminent!

    Even outright fraud in the preaching purpose redounded as a benefit!

    But, there was a fly in the ointment.

    THE MESSAGE could not be made available all at once to everybody or the work would implode!

    The only way for Jehovah's Protection Racket to stay healthy would be this:

    1. The public at large must have only a vague idea of who Jehovah's Witnesses really are (or the public eye would see through the corporate treadmill and start asking where the money went.)

    2. The rank and file must always bear the burden of selling the books and magazines to keep them busy.

    3. The use of martyrs has a limited purpose. If the relatives of martyrs start suing in court: the game is up!

    The legal situation got out of hand suddenly when people started questioning the backpeddling on delicate issues such as child molestation policy and medical emergency policy.

    A buffer of protection was needed to separate the Governing Body from legal responsibility for their hurtful policy-making edicts.

    Thus, the re-organization came and went without much publicity reaching the lower ranks and all was well.

    Which brings us back to the question: Why no TV ministry?

    As we have seen the purpose of the Governing Body is to generate investment capital through real estate ventures. A TV ministry would dry up that money machine quickly by generating a high-profile examination on the part of the newly well-informed public. An actual full-frontal presentation of the weirdness behind JW thinking would kill the vague persona of citizen do-gooders who clean up after themselves at conventions. The scrutiny would become intensely focused on Brooklyn, NY and the actual men who are power brokers on the throne of power.

    Publicity has served the corporate purpose when they can frame that publicity as Kingdom Work. Publicity of a different nature could destroy them!

    The lawsuits and exposure by internet sites dredging up failed prophecy and policy waffling are a sore point. Governing Body power can only deal with rank and file unrest by clamping down with threats and a tightening grip. It cannot control non-members curiosity. It cannot ignore penetrating questions of authority by threats if the press starts bombarding them with high-profile questions hanging in the air unanswered.

    That is why there is no TV ministry for Jehovah's Witnesses. It is a kind of self-fashioned paradox that the Watchtower claims to be heralding an important and urgent message and yet demonstrates an absolute horror of making that message public effectively by using the best technology available.

    Follow the money and it leads to a cover up; not a revelation of Christ's presence.

    A new generation of leader will emerge soon at the top of the corporate ladder in Brooklyn. A younger and more legally-protected leadership will shift this money machine into high gear once again by protecting its assets and eliminating its liabilities. What changes will this bring to the local congregations?

    Not the one they are praying for! The key purpose of new leadership will be to make individual responsibility invisible.

    THERE WILL BE A GREAT AND POWERFUL OZ at the helm with fire and smoke and mirrors.

    But, for the local Kingdom Halls it will be grunt work as usual.

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    ABBA sang, Money, Money, Money - its a rich mans world

    Liza Minneli sang Money Makes the World go round ,the world go round

  • R.Crusoe
    R.Crusoe

    Suppose the guys at the helm began to believe they were just a fake! How to dissolve all the finance and let go all the believers?

    It's like a guy who has children with a wife he knows he shouldn't be with and stays for the responsibility of it all! He really doesn't believe in the relationship!

    That's the simple view! Any further than that and we get into politics and power and group control by a few individuals with an extra special view of themselves! With all the publicity and coming up with new light, a person in that position must feel imposed upon! I do wonder how they can ever believe in themselves as being uniquely chosen by god for the salvation of the whole human race. Very odd the more I think about it!

  • fifi40
    fifi40

    Terry

    Two thought provoking threads............have you being overdosing on a fish diet recently

  • Terry
    Terry
    Two thought provoking threads............have you being overdosing on a fish diet recently

    No, just raiding the pantry of old ideas I've tossed out for discussion before. JWD seems to infuse with new people about every six months. Old ones go on to life and new ones enter.

    I thought I'd throw this out and see what the new folks think.

  • Terry
    Terry

    Giving among World Religions and Cults

    The world has many religious views that regard giving as a way to win God’s favor or assuage one’s personal guilt, but Christianity is not one of these. Rather, the Bible measures human giving according to Jesus, the one perfect standard of generosity. Scripture also measures generosity by how much it reflects the giver’s recognition of salvation and gratitude to Christ (Luke 7:47). The table below is neither authoritative nor scientific. Because space does not permit us to include variations in orthodoxy, fervor or practice within each group, this table should serve only as a helpful starting point in your study.


    Bahá’í
    Buddhism
    Confucianism
    Hinduism
    Islam
    Jehovah’s Witnesses
    Judaism
    Mormonism
    Unitarian-Universalism

  • Articles & Papers
  • Articles & Papers
  • Articles & Papers
  • Articles & Papers
  • Religion
    or Cult
    Legal
    Requirement
    Spiritual
    Motivation
    Source of
    Teaching
    Amount
    Given
    More
    Info
    Bahá’íHuqúqu’lláh, or the Right of God, is a voluntary payment of 19 percent of accumulated wealth that Bahá’ís make to the Universal House of Justice. 34The fundamental principle of the Bahá’í is the unity and oneness of humanity. Giving helps bring about that oneness by bridging the gap between rich and poor. Beyond the essentials of prayer, meditation and fasting, Bahá’ís view good deeds and service to humanity as the most important elements of spiritual training and progress. 35 “If he is a Bahá’í in reality, his deeds and actions will be decisive proofs of it. What are the requirements? Love for mankind, sincerity toward all, reflecting the oneness of the world of humanity, philanthropy, becoming enkindled with the fire of the love of God, attainment to the knowledge of God and that which is conducive to human welfare.” 36 Contributions are considered a sacred obligation, in order to expand Bahá’í spiritual activities. 37Kitáb-i-Aqdas 97There are 7.1 million Bahá’ís worldwide. 38 Giving is anonymous and conditional on the individual’s conscience. 39 The Bahá’ís have raised large amounts of money to build elaborate temples throughout the world.
    BuddhismAlms, known as the dana, are a completely voluntary contribution made to the gods, nuns and monks. 3 Generosity is the first of 10 virtues that a Buddhist must attain in order to reach enlightenment. 11Giving cultivates purity in the heart of the giver and allows the giver to make progress toward enlightenment. 16 Generosity brings blessings in the afterlife 11 and is motivated out of a concern for others over self. 17 The dana also exists to support the teachers of the dharma 18 and to promote social harmony. 11Dhammapada 224There are 364 million Buddhists in the world who give according to their own individual desires. 1
    ConfucianismConfucianism encourages particular acts of benevolence directed toward known individuals or groups, rather than philanthropic efforts from anonymous donors to distant recipients. 12Philanthropy is motivated out of “specific ethical patterns” and “relational structures” of society. 26 Giving is always to be done in the context of relationships out of a sense of duty and indebtedness and as opposed to the anonymous or altruistic giving that is typical in the West. 27 Generosity is part of cultivating the ultimate virtue of “humaneness” in order to maintain “equilibrium.” 28Analects 1:6; 4:2Japan’s Imperial Relief Association, established by the Confucian Meiji Emperor, contributed 10 million yen in seed money to provide medical assistance to the poor and to encourage contributions from the wealthy. 29 Japan made the largest recorded contributions ($5 million total) to the United Nations during peace-keeping efforts in Cambodia. 30 Presently, there are more than 20,000 private foundations in Japan, but only some 2,000 give grants, and only 250 have assets over $500,000. In 1990 a One Percent Club was established whereby corporate executives in Japan agreed to give 1 percent of their pretax profits and 10 percent of their own salaries to charity. 31
    HinduismAccording to the religious law, known as the dharma, Hindus are required to give the dana and the seva. 19 Hindus are expected to make donations to the poor as well as to their worship temples. 20Leading one’s life according to the dharma is essential for reaching moksha, or salvation. However, the dharma is primarily focused on prescribing what is worth doing in the present life. 21 Fulfilling the
    dharma requires that the wealthy give charitably to those in need, excepting those outside of the caste system, known as the outcastes. 22 These charitable acts aid the person in the quest for nirvana. 23
    Bhagawad Gita 17.20, 17.25There are 824 million Hindi in the world who view wealth as a means for their own individual spiritual progress. 1
    IslamThe third of five pillars of Islam requires Muslims to give the zakah, an annual alms tax of 2.5 percent of their net worth. 24 Sadaqah, or charity beyond the zakah, is also encouraged. 25Muslims do have an overall spiritual commitment to giving as it is one of the five pillars of Islam. Most branches or schools of Islam teach that some level of giving is necessary for salvation, ranging between 2 and 20 percent of annual income. But like many other aspects of Islam, there is great social pressure surrounding the practice giving so that giving may sometimes be less about piety than it is about fulfilling an social obligation to one’s community. 40 Giving zakah and sadaqah also is a way of purifying one’s possessions and attaining righteousness, as well as making provision for the poor. 25The Quran 9:71, 9:103, 9:60, 3:92, 73:20The world has over 1.2 billion Muslims. 1 In 2001, Islamic charities in the United States raised $70 million. 14 Annual income for U.S. Muslims is estimated at $1.5 billion. If American Muslims paid sadaqah at the average rate that most Americans give to charity, in addition to paying zakah, they would give $1.03 billion. 15
    Jehovah’s
    Witnesses
    Members of the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society cult are not compelled to tithe, but they are still encouraged to give according to what they have resolved in their own hearts. 32Tithing was a requirement that only applied to Israelites in the Old Testament. Tithing is not necessary for salvation today. Jehovah’s Witnesses encourage “Giving that brings Joy” to support “true worship,” Bible education, and to provide for the material needs of other Jehovah’s Witnesses.New World Translation version of 1 Corinthians 16:2; 2 Corinthians 8:12, 13; 9:6; 1 Timothy 5:8The Watchtower reports that there are 6,304,645 active Jehovah’s Witnesses worldwide, who emphasize Bible education work over financial giving. From 1987 to 1989, the mean percentage of income given for Jehovah’s Witnesses was just under 3 percent. 8
    JudaismJews are required to give tzedakah, which traditionally entails giving 10 percent of one’s income to those who are in need. Charity beyond the tzedakah is also encouraged. 13Giving tzedakah is not an act of charity. Rather, it is a matter of obedience. “Some sages have said that tzedakah is the highest of all commandments, equal to all of them combined, and that a person who does not perform tzedakah is equivalent to an idol worshipper.
    Tzedakah is one of the three acts that gain [the giver] forgiveness from [his] sins.” 13 Charity beyond the
    tzedakah is not essential. Lisa Keister notes, “Jewish families encourage this-worldly pursuits including actual accumulation of wealth and other activities that lead to wealth accumulation.” 4
    Maimonides’ Ladder of CharityThere are 14.5 million Jews in the world. 1 In America, contributions from Jewish philanthropists reached nearly $2 billion in 1998. 5
    MormonismOften mistaken for a Christian denomination, the Mormon religious movement expects its members to pay a tithe (10 percent) of their incomes to build up and support the work of the church. 33Tithing is not so much a matter of dollars as it is a matter of faith. It becomes a privilege and an opportunity, not a burden. 33King James Version of Malachi 3:10; The Doctrines and Covenants of the Mormon ChurchUtah, which is over 70 percent Mormon 6 , is the U.S. state with the highest proportion of charitable giving from the wealthy (households with annual gross income of more than $200,000). The IRS reported, “Of the 9,800 Utah filers with adjusted gross incomes of more than $200,000, donations per filer stood at $42,000. Their average assets were $3.2 million.” 7 In 1987-89, Mormons gave almost 7.5 percent of their incomes. 8
    Unitarian-
    Universalism
    Giving is encouraged in this liberal Enlightenment-era religious movement but is not compulsory. Giving is guided by the conscience and reason of the individual.Giving to other people empowers them and provides the donor with the opportunity to find meaning by affecting the future through generosity.Stewardship: the Joy of Giving: Stewardship for Adults education curriculumFrom 2002 to 2003, congregations of the Unitarian Universalist Association gave $5,731,096 to their Annual Program Fund. 9 Ten individuals gave over $5,000 each. Over 100 individuals gave between $1,000 and $4,999. 10 The mean percentage of income given for Unitarian-Universalists was under 1 percent, the lowest amount among 23 other religious groups and denominations in America.
  • drew sagan
    drew sagan

    The first thing I began to question when I started to doubt the Watchtower was field service. I could see that we where just wasting our time, and that giving people magazines simply wasn't effective.

    I think the Watchtower really doesn't want to draw attention to itself. Even though they tell their members they want to reach all people, the leaders really know what section of the population they want to reach with their message (lonely people at home with possibly no social connections). I believe the leaders are happy with 1-5% growth. Anything to big and then they would have to deal with some of the problems larger groups face in the public square. So I think they would rather waste magazines while continue to do things they way they have for the past 70 years rather than move for big drastic change.

  • sacolton
    sacolton

    I think it's all about real estate ... they are buying up land and plopping down buildings.

    Does anyone in the WTBTS receive a paycheck? Where does the billions of dollars go? Are Third-World rectangular mud huts expensive to build?

  • horrible life
    horrible life

    POWER INVESTMENT!

    REAL ESTATE!

    The Watchtower was a corporate Donald Trump. It could grow dollars and not have to pay taxes on them. It could point to a worldwide work as evidence of money well spent (which wasn't really "spent" at all.) It could account for the cash flow by pointing to new projects in development and new acquisitions ostensibly for more and more publishing effort.

    But, in reality, the goose just kept laying golden eggs in the nest of Governing Body members.

    Now that they are selling off real estate in New York and laying off workers, what will be their next investment? They certainly aren't going to give it to special pioneers, and missionaries!! They will fend for themselves.

    Is there cheaper real estate to invest in? Maybe large tracts of land, to build a commune?? That can't be it, because that would be giving to the rank and file.

    What do you suppose is their next move, with the money they are getting from sales? Is investing in the stock market the same as real estate?

    Is their purpose to pull out completely from New York? Slowly, as to not put a glut of buildings on the market. I have said this before here, Brooklyn as the people of New York know it, will never be the same.

    GOOD BYE AND GOOD RIDDENCE WATCHTOWER!!!!!! DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOUR ASS AS YOU LEAVE!!!!

  • coffee_black
    coffee_black

    Great post Terry,

    It is truly a money making machine.... If you follow the money...where does it all go? I've been wondering that for a very long time.

    Coffee

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit