This thread reminds me of a conversation I had with my father when I told him I no longer believed the JW doctrine.
"But I don't understand why? You used to be so intelligent! What happened?"
Translation: If you believe as I believe then you are intelligent because I believe I am intelligent. If I accept you are intelligent and then you go and believe something the complete opposite of what I believe, then what does that say about my intelligence? How can two intelligent people possibly believe different things? They can't, therefore one of us must be stupid. I know it's not me, therefore it must be you!"
This type of flawed logic exists because people equate uniformity of belief with being "right". They equate having the "right" answer as being "smart".
We are conditioned to reason this way from our parents and our earliest teachers who often teach by rote (as does the WTBTS). Beliefs have little to do with facts and quite a bit to do do with conditioning, insecurities and fears about change.
One of the biggest eye-openers for me was when I went to university and I asked difficult questions my professors couldn't answer. Some commended me on my brilliant intellect and recommended I take more advanced courses. Hmm. Not the reaction I was expecting. I half expected them to get angry and defensive as did my parents, my husband, and some elders (actually there are a few professors who do get arrogant and defensive when challenged by their pupils). They are not well respected by the student body. They may be brilliant but they are afraid to have their [superior authority] challenged. Very much like the governing body and many elders.
Your husband is quite simply afraid, Cognac. He is reacting to his fear by attacking the external stimulus of it (you) instead of examining the source of it. If he can belittle your intelligence, then he can dismiss your words, then he doesn't have to examine his own beliefs or the fears he has of doing so.
Cog