I was thinking about the fact that death has been happening for eons and yet we haven't gotten used to it, that even though we may try to avoid even thinking about it, death is inevitable for all of us.
Of course "we" haven't gotten used to it because "we" only die once after, hopefully, living 80 years or so. I don't try to avoid thinking about it. I know it's going to happen; that doesn't mean I need to spend what life I do have left fearing it.
I thought I made it clear from the outset, my premise is that if God wasn't able to enforce His decree that ALL would die, some (especially the rich, wily, crafty) would be able to wiggle out of death's clutches.
17 To Adam he said, "Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, 'You must not eat of it,'
"Cursed is the ground because of you;
through painful toil you will eat of it
all the days of your life.
18 It will produce thorns and thistles for you,
and you will eat the plants of the field.
19 By the sweat of your brow
you will eat your food
until you return to the ground,
since from it you were taken;
for dust you are
and to dust you will return."
As well as telling Adam that he would die, he also told him he would have to work very hard for his food. Some (especially the rich, wily, crafty) have wiggled out of this decree. Does this, by your method of reasoning, mean that God was unable to enforce this statement?
That is ONE of the reasons why I'm so impressed with the God of the Bible. He states what is going to happen - and it happens.
Do you have any examples of specific, non-ambiguous things that God has said will happen and that have happened that are not explainable by the writers of the literature involved already having common knowledge that would allow for the statements to be explained as common sense?
WE ALL DIE. I see no circular reasoning, a priori, confirmation bias, or anything else in that statement.
you're misrepresenting the subject under consideration. We're not discussing whether we all die or not; we're discussing whether people writing down what God supposedly said about it and it happening, and any potential reasons for belief thereof.
Are you suggesting that the fact that we all die, and that the God of the bible said this would happen, is a reason for faith in the said book and God?
I am stating that this is one of my reasons for such.
This is the formal fallacy known as affirming the consequent. You're affirming the consequent because you want to confirm what you already believe (confirmation bias).
Another person could make an equally invalid argument by saying "If life is a biochemical process, we would expect death due to limitations imposed by the laws of thermodynamics. We all die. Therefore, life is a biochemical process."