Hey, she has the tits and the tatts. She's pretty. Nice smile.
That's why I chose her. She's beautiful. As Andy always told me: beauty doesn't come in one size. Those girls are so pretty, they'd turn down most of these guys.
by John Doe 93 Replies latest jw friends
Hey, she has the tits and the tatts. She's pretty. Nice smile.
That's why I chose her. She's beautiful. As Andy always told me: beauty doesn't come in one size. Those girls are so pretty, they'd turn down most of these guys.
Not too sure about the hour glass fashions though, they scare me a bit. lol
Oh, I don't know, I think they look pretty good. Better than most of the "oinkers" could ever get.
Now I concede, this is scary, but it's got nothing to do with her size:
Yikes Have a look at Miss Hush. She even has her own site.
cog dis,
:If "oinker" is what all the female fatso's are called, what are all the male fatso's with stretch marks and no babies for a decent excuse called? Do enlighten us Farkel?
Nothing to enlighten. The title of this thread is about oinker men, not oinker hypocrital women. Fat men are every bit as gross as fat women, but women are more vain about it. Men never call women "chauvenists" but women who have been influenced by psychos like Betty Friedan and Gloria Steinen, et. al. (losers with men) are without men in their lives and they wonder why they are alone and not getting laid.
Women's libbers deserve exactly what they have worked so hard to get: pussy men and no real men.
You got what you wanted, libbers. If a "woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle" then a man needs a woman only if he wants his life to be a miserable hell.
Men are protectors and warriers. Women want them to play with dolls and "be sensitive". Those men might as well have their nuts cut off.
I will never give up my masculinity for that crowd. They deserve what they get. Emasculated men who can never please their sorry confused asses.
Farkel
I think someone here has been listening to Tom Lykis a little too long.
Hey Farkel, women don't like spinelessness in men, not ven fatso, lesbian bitches.
I was always for people's lib, never women's lib.
I think too much emphasis is shown to the radical forms of feminism. That's your lesbian-man-hating-wishes-all men-could-be-drowned-at-birth kind. Say feminism and that's what a lot of people immediately picture.
I'm a liberal feminist, in that I believe neither men or women are superior or inferior to each other and that people should be judged individually on their own merits, not what's between their legs. No hate involved. I don't even believe you need to be female to call yourself a feminist.
I've never read anything by Betty Friedman or Gloria Steinman, I like masculine men a lot and get laid regularly, thanks for your concern!
I also consider myself a feminist. Which by definition, only means that women should have equal rights under the law as men do. Maybe someone ought to change the name to humanist! It might get less backlash.
The only men I don't like are the ones who so obviously don't like women. I'm not sure why they don't like women. Maybe they are fat gay bastards from hell or something?
I thought that feminism was the female equivalent male chauvinism. It’s done nearly as much harm…….
BTW is an "oinker" a rhyming euphemism for "wanker" or is it in reference of a pig……???