Mary; I don't see a change because the article does say that Jesus deciples saw a limited fulfillment in para 14. Para 16 does seem to link 1914 with 9 decades passing since Christ was installed as king and proving "ourselves ready...soon he will come to destroy his enemies". In para 15 mention is made of the modern day generation of contemporaries but consisting solely of anointed ones.
I think this is a case where they've injected so many different hypothesis into one study article, that the average Witness comes away vastly confused and not quite sure what the change is.
On one hand, the February 15, 2008 article says:
Many different things, including "the last days" of this wicked system of things, the gathering of the chosen ones, and their resurrection to heavenly life, occur during this presence of Jesus. (2 Tim. 3:1; 1 Cor. 15:23; 1 Thess. 4:15-17; 2Thess. 2:1) It could be said that the period constituting "the conclusion of the system of things" (syn-te'lei-a) corresponds to or runs parallel with the period called Christ's presence (pa-rou-si'a). * The time period during which "this generation" lives seems to correspond to the period covered by the first vision in the book of Revelation. (Rev. 1:10-3:22) This feature of the Lord's day extends from 1914 until the last of the faithful anointed ones dies and is resurrected.—See Revelation—Its Grand Climax At Hand! page 24, paragraph 4.
But then in the very same article they say:
Since Jesus did not use negative qualifiers when speaking to them about "this generation," the apostles would no doubt have understood that they and their fellow disciples were to be part of the "generation" that would not pass away "until all these things [would] occur."
So on one hand, they're claiming that "the last days" only occur "during the presence of Jesus" (1914), but on the other hand they claim that the apostles from 2,000 years ago were part of the "generation" that would not "pass away until all these things occur".
The main problem with such a claim is that the only function of "this generation" that Jesus spoke of, was that they would see both the beginning of the 'last days' and it's end:
Luke 21:28: "....But as these things start to occur [the signs of the Last Days], raise yourselves erect and lift YOUR heads up, because YOUR deliverance is getting near."
Logically then, if "this generation" began with his disciples 2,000 years ago (as is confirmed in par 13 & 14), then that means the disciples were alive when "these things start[ed] to occur"----namely, the Last Days.*----there simply is no other function of "this generation", other than to witness all the signs Jesus gave.
So the comparison between what they changed in the February 15, 2008 WT and the December 1, 1984 WT article more or less shows that the "New Light" about "this generation" is apparently based on 'apostate thinking' from 1984. Or at least that's what I'm getting out of it.
garybuss said: If the "generation" started with the Apostles, the "last days" would have had to start then too. If the last days didn't start with the generation, then they are not related. :-)
That's my thought too. If the 'last days' don't run parallel with "this generation", then the whole thing is moot.