Why can't we:
1. Concentrate on Bldg. 7? This is the topic of this thread. If you want to bring up government and theories, just start a new thread already!
2. Answer some of Shawn's questions? Or tell him why they are bad questions? Or admit that you know the answer to them but aren't emotionally ready to talk about it? Or SOMETHING? Please if you are going to ignore the questions as if they are so stupid they are not worth it, again, just start a new thread and be done with it.
No one dares answer my questions because the answers are obvious.
Thank you to the steel worker for his comments. I think he answered some of my questions indirectly.
I suggest we all get some education in high rises and engineering. I know I am. I'm tired of being told I don't know sh*t about it, by other people who don't know sh*t about it, so I'm just going to educate myself. Matbe I'm totally mistaken. I could be wrong about everything. But imagine if the whole nation banded together and studied engineering. If 90% of the population had the equivalent of say, a 2 year degree in engineering (which I know isn't much), what would the nation think about bldg. 7? That's not an answerable question of course, just speculation.
As in the title of this thread, the original poster admits that bldg 7 is a MYSTERY. Why would a natural occurrence be a mystery? If it followed the known rules of the universe, nature, logic, gravity for christ's sake, would it be a mystery? No. It is because it denies all logic, science and natural laws that it is a mystery. What happened to bldg 7... (mind you, I am not commenting on the whole of the 9/11 conspiracy theory, I am exclusively commenting on bldg 7s fall, not whether or not it is possible for 5,000, 10,000 people to band together in a secret conspiracy) ...was not natural. Was it impossible that it fell naturally right in on itself? No, i'm not saying that it was either. What I am saying is that it denies KNOWN logic, and natural laws.
Was it demolitioned? It sure looks like it, is all I can say, and NOONE can possibly deny that statement. NOONE. I don't even think anyone has denied that it LOOKS like a flawless demolition. Not JUST a demolition: a typical, classic and FLAWLESS demolition. Whoever demo'd it (if someone did) did not even attempt to make it not look like a demolition! Whoever did it (if someone did) WANTED us to notice that it looked an awful lot like a demolition. Now THAT is a mystery!