I am getting 2 major points from this thread:
1. The WT has no business in anyone's marriage, EVER, for any reason. If a mate is abused physically, it is his or her business to do what they think is best; why elders want to step in the middle of that is insane. That is for professionals, they are rank amateurs. I don't even know what spiritual endangerment is; what does that mean? In a marriage, if someone tries to physically prevent you from going to meeting, or forces you to go, that is physical abuse, right? If it is a matter of arguments about beliefs, can a witness or non witness not stand up for themselves? This concept is invented by the WT to protect a donating member from being taken from the membership rolls.
2. Local elder bodies vary wildly in how they see what the WT hands down, and so purplesofa sees what appears to be a more reasonable reaction from the elders, whereas in our state we had a circuit overseer who said that if a husband slaps his wife around the wife should not go running to the elders. The WT is run by lawyers, to a great degree; they seem to push for statements, in print anyway, that can be taken 2 or more ways, to cover their corporate behind. NO ONE should listen to what they say.
P