God punishes to the 3rd and 4th Generation! How nice! (page 9)

Perry

I'm outta here too. Time to go handle some snakes or something.

You hvae the TRUTH Perry you can't argue against theTuth and Gods Organization, Oh Wait that's the other religion you followed but now you have the real Truth right? Who says i'm an Atheist have i ever said that?

I don't want anyting to do with that God of the Bible! If there is a God i have alot of questions none that you have any answers too because you are just as lost but you think you have all the answers! I learned from my mistakes being a witness and you just coninue with the same crap Oh i have the truth now. You need som Church to tell you what to do because you were raised a Watchtower Zombie. I was not raised i have my own brain while you need somone to think for you!

Have fun!

BurnTheShips

All life is a gift from God. It's up to God to determine how much of that gift we receive. Whether he gives us a day or a century, the gift is his to give, and because it is a gift, it is not something we are owed. Therefore we cannot claim that God is being unfair with us if he gives us one amount of this gift rather than another. In fact, he gives all of us an infinite amount of this gift because, once we are created, we will endure forever.

BTS

Number1Anarchist

" If a man happens to meet a virgin who is not pledged to be married and rapes her and they are discovered, he shall pay the girl's father fifty shekels of silver. He must marry the girl, for he has violated her. He can never divorce her as long as he lives."
Deuteronomy 22:28-29

Sounds like a just God to me! Your daughter gets raped and the guy becomes your son in law for 50 sheckles!

KAYTEE

Manasseh according to 2Kings 21-6 was bad in the eyes of Jehovah.

He had a son Amon who also was just as bad, 2Kings 21-20

Then comes Josiah who was accepted by God 2kings 22-2

So Josiah had a bad FATHER AND GRANDFATHER but was good.

I don’t read of him being punished for his parentage.

KT

hamilcarr

5 pages further, everyone still ducks the question and evades the discussion.

Number1Anarchist

Exactly Hamilcarr! I guess they think we don't see them dodging the question. The funny thing is they have the same attitude they had as a Witness acting like they have all the answers. Some people never learn!

cameo-d

Read Mendel's Laws of Inheritance

Number1Anarchist

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/03/050323115547.htm

http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/510632/

This means that inheritance can happen more flexibly than we thought in the past," said Robert Pruitt, a Purdue Department of Botany and Plant Pathology molecular geneticist. "While Mendel's laws that we learned in high school still are fundamentally correct, they're not absolute.

Science News

Plants Defy Mendel's Inheritance Laws, May Prompt Textbook Changes

ScienceDaily (Mar. 23, 2005) — WEST LAFAYETTE, Ind. - Contrary to inheritance laws the scientific world has accepted for more than 100 years, some plants revert to normal traits carried by their grandparents, bypassing genetic abnormalities carried by both parents.

These mutant parent plants apparently have hidden templates containing genetic information from the preceding generation that can be transferred to their offspring, even though the traits aren't evident in the parents, according to Purdue University researchers. This discovery flies in the face of the scientific laws of inheritance first described by Gregor Mendel in the mid-1800s and still taught in classrooms around the world today.

"This means that inheritance can happen more flexibly than we thought in the past," said Robert Pruitt, a Purdue Department of Botany and Plant Pathology molecular geneticist. "While Mendel's laws that we learned in high school still are fundamentally correct, they're not absolute.

"If the inheritance mechanism we found in the research plant Arabidopsis exists in animals, too, it's possible that it will be an avenue for gene therapy to treat or cure diseases in both plants and animals."

The study is published in the March 24 issue of the journal Nature.

Pruitt and collaborator Susan Lolle found that Arabidopsis in which each parent plant had two copies of a mutant gene could produce progeny that didn't show the parents' deformity, but rather were normal like the grandparents. Under Mendelian laws, the offspring should have shown the same mutation.

The first clue that the classic inheritance rules didn't always apply was the discovery of normal flowers on some offspring of mutant plants. In the deformed parents, the flowers were fused into tight balls. But in the grandparents and 10 percent of the grandchildren, the buds become 1-millimeter-long, bright white flowers that fully opened and radiated out from the center of a cluster.

"If you take this mutant Arabidopsis, which has two copies of the altered gene, let it seed and then plant the seeds, 90 percent of the offspring will look like the parent, but 10 percent will look like the normal grandparents," Pruitt said. "Our genetic training tells us that's just not possible. This challenges everything we believe.

"We've done a lot of experiments, described in this paper, that show none of the simple explanations account for this skipping of generations by an inherited trait."

The scientists kept the plants in isolation so they couldn't accidentally crossbreed with plants that didn't have the mutated gene, called hothead, that causes organ fusion like that seen in the flowers. The researchers used molecular markers - bits of DNA that help identify and locate genes in organisms - to determine whether a plant carried normal or mutant copies of the genes.

"It seems that these hothead-containing plants keep a cryptic copy of everything that was in the previous generation, even though it doesn't show up in the DNA, it's not in the chromosome," Pruitt said. "Some other type of gene sequence information that we don't really understand yet is modifying the inherited traits."

Although the hothead gene tipped the researchers off to this unconventional inheritance cycle, Pruitt believes that this particular DNA sequence is just a trigger for the phenomenon. He suspects that a number of other genes and the proteins they produce are involved in activating this process.

"We need to understand more about the molecular mechanics of how this process works," Pruitt said. "Then we will know exactly what role this gene plays."

Pruitt's team already knows that animals don't have hothead genes, either normal or mutated, so the scientists must investigate which genes might affect this novel inheritance in both plants and animals.

"There are probably a lot of other triggers yet to be discovered, and this mechanism for inheritance may require a different trigger to make it work in animals," he said.

Once scientists understand more about the mechanism, they then may be able to manipulate it to modify genes already in plants and animals in order to correct mutations that cause diseases and abnormal growth.

Though further research is required to learn how this form of inheritance happens and how it can help improve plants or animals through gene therapy, Pruitt said the discovery has opened an important new line of thinking.

The other researchers involved with this study were Jennifer Victor, a former Purdue graduate student now at Butler University; and Jessica Young, a botany and plant pathology laboratory technician. Lolle, a Purdue research scientist, is currently at the National Science Foundation.

The National Science Foundation provided funding for this research.

cameo-d

There are several Laws of Inheritance. Environmental is also one aspect. Just because you look up and paste one article does not show that you really have a grasp on the significance of genetic inheritance.

A lot of this is influenced by Darwin. (who incidentially, was a contemporary of Mendel.)

God punishes to the 3rd and 4th Generation! How nice!

Science News

Share this