WILL I BE DISFELLOWSHIPPED?

by jazz 40 Replies latest jw friends

  • ChuckD
    ChuckD

    The STUDDED LEATHER Porn belt, actually.

  • DB
    DB

    To have committed pornea, you would have had to actually manipulate the other person's genitalia or engage in sex relations. I don't see how cyber-sex falls into that category, since the person stimulates him/herself.

    In a Question From Readers a few years back, a guy wrote in that his wife had admitted to fantasizing about another guy. He asked if he could divorce her on the grounds of fornication. The answer given was no, since no actual sex had taken place. I wish I could remember which issue of the WT that was, but offhand I cannot recall; I only recall that it may have been written about 5-7 years ago, but maybe more.

  • ashitaka
    ashitaka

    I'm In the Jersey Fresh porn belt.

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    I'm rolling, baby, im rolling.................lol

  • Valis
    Valis

    DB, please do remember that JWs also consider thinking of sinfull activities and not being repentant is the same as the sin itself.

  • Valis
    Valis

    Sorry for double post, but the reasoning behind my previous statement was that presumably Dog knew exactly what you were thinking, say something like coveting the elder's wife....

  • oscartheduck
    oscartheduck

    YOu might find http://home2.inet.tele.dk/carloc/unit5b.htm helpful.

    It contains such nice quotes as:

    "Before forming a committee, elders determine if the accu-
    sation has substance.

    It must Scripturally be an offense serious enough to
    result in disfellowshipping.

    There must be either two witnesses or a confession of
    wrongdoing.

    If there is not enough evidence to form a committee
    but serious questions have been raised, two elders may
    be assigned to investigate the matter. "

    "Instead of looking for rigid rules for guidance, elders
    should think in terms of principles; judge each case on its
    own merits. "

    "There must be two or three eyewitnesses, not just persons
    repeating what they have heard; no action can be taken if
    there is only one witness. (Deut. 19:15;Jol1ll 8:17)

    Confession (admission of wrongdoing), either written or
    oral, may be accepted as conclusive proof without other
    corroborating evidence. (Josh. 7:19)

    Strong circumstantial evidence, such as pregnancy or evi-
    dence (testified to by at least two witnesses) that the
    accused stayed all night in the same house with a person of
    the opposite sex (or in the same house with a known
    homosexual ) under improper circumstances, is acceptable."

    " In cases where it is established that a serious sin was
    actually committed, the judicial committee should con-
    sider such factors as these:...Are there extenuating factors, such as emotional or
    mental disorders or having been a victim of some type
    of abuse in the past, that should be considered?

    Was it a single offense, or was it committed more than
    once? ...Was his confession voluntary, or did he have to be ac-
    cused by others before confessing?

    Was his reluctance to speak more a result of deep shame
    than of lack of repentance?

    Above all does he show true repentance and manifest a
    heartfelt desire to avoid repetition of the wrong?

    Even though the wrongdoer is guilty of a serious of-
    fense, elders on the judicial committee realize that their
    aim is to recover the one who has fallen into a wrong
    course, whenever this is possible. (Jude 23 )

    ============================
    The Watchtower, April 15, 1928, p. 126 "As every one knows, there are mistakes in the Bible "

  • apostate
    apostate

    Go to the United Nations' web site, download a copy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    You can find it here: http://www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/eng.htm

    Print it out, give a copy to the elders. Tell them if they don't leave you alone you will send an e-mail to millions of people around the world teaching them how the Watchtower Corporation abuses a number of human rights.

    It will shut them up.

  • DB
    DB

    You are correct, Valis, but I don't think that dfing would result in this case. I did serve as an elder for quite some time, and in no case was a person df'd for thinking wrong thoughts. The bottom line is, something has to actually happen, in this case actual physical contact.

  • Valis
    Valis

    True, I was just remembering those talks about how Dog knew what you were thinking and doing out of the view of thers and indeed it was sinfull to think nasty thoughts, and the use of pornography would indicate the desire for such activity/thoughts. Maybe only public rebuke...that's always fun.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit