. They pretty well fit the ridiculous accusations of the 9-11 deniers. Look deeply at where this comes from and you will find garden variety Bush haters.
-------------
I don't have a clue what the definition of a 'denier' is but since I haven't once 'denied' that an attack took place, planes flew into buildings, people were killed, buildings collapsed - then I know that I can't be one.
As for where the article came from - big deal. You ignored all the conspiracies proven fact articles that I printed in response to those that say 'it can't happen' and those are factual articles posted all over by reputable journalists. Again, who cares? I could have found the same type of article anywhere - that one just sounded interesting is all. No 'conspiracy' here.
Let me also put to rest your notion of me hating Bush. I really don't hate anybody and Bush - well, not even him. My opinion of him rests on his actions which I have found destructive to the unity of the country - lying to bomb Iraq is one of those. I do not hate him and if the place where the article comes from happens to be in your definition a 'bush hating' site, and you find that offensive, well, I do suppose if I were so inclined, I could find you another article from a Gregor approved site - but I'm sure you'd find fault with that one too.
The old chicken and the egg isn't it?
You demand back up why someone doesn't believe all of the story they've been told to believe and yet - I've given it to you over and over again and it isn't good enough. You seem bent on making people accept the event as they've been told - even though the government can't agree that all is as it seems. Perhaps the fairy tale is in the commission report which we now know is not accurate - as you say - it's up to the people writing the fairy tale to make it real and so far, the commission report as it stands, apparently needs to be revised.
Funny thing you know. Free speech and justice. Those thousands of people who were murdered never got their day in court. That's what the commission was supposed to do - be unbiased, investigate and recommend - and yet, the very committee that was supposed to give them that justice, hasn't. If someone lies on the stand under oath in a murder trial, they have broken the law. At least 3,000 people died - not by an accident - they were murdered. If people who had information relevant to the investigation lied (as the committee believes they may have proof of) then, they broke the law. That means that there has been no justice at all.
That's not denying an attack on the people of this country, it's asking for justice for them and it's asking that every attempt be made to ensure that next time it isn't 30,000. Pity you can't see that. sammieswife.
