Is Darwinism True?

by Perry 71 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Perry
    Perry

    See, we could go on and on. None of that is unproveable, but it is certainly unreasonable to believe such things without proof.

    I know I see this all the time in people who deny creation, like Leolaia. It just doesn't make sense. People like her would have us believe that a single cell with the complexity of a city is "simple". It boggles the mind how they can be so dismissive.

    Here is a video from Harvard showing a FEW of the processes that go on in a cell re: dna, rna, enzyme instructions and production etc. Keep in mind that all of these things are interdependent and have to appear at the same time in order for the cell to function:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5HbwUGeNsw&feature=related

  • notverylikely
    notverylikely

    The impression given in the media, classrooms, and even the dominant belief on this board is that natural selection and random mutations can account for the complexity of life.

    How do you know this? Can you cite a source for this? That is not the current thinking.

  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut

    I know I see this all the time in people who deny creation, like Leolaia.

    You must just be the longest surviving troll on JWD/JWN. You cannot believe your own crap and you intentionally twist whatever is said. You must be laughing that we spent so much time trying to "help" you see through the cloud in your thinking.

    Why don't you and Trevor go have a beer?

  • OUTLAW
    OUTLAW

    Evolution VS Creation..

    Evolution-Fact.....Creation-Fucked..

    It`s your choice Perry..Fact or Fucked..

    ....................... ...OUTLAW

  • Perry
    Perry

    OTWO,

    Still hiding from my questions? How do you know what is true? That is not trolling dear friend. If you cannot tell me how you determine truth, how can you possibly explain how you know that Creation is false?

    NVL,

    I know this from talking to proponents of Darwinism here on this board, my own biology university experience and from this quote on the site that all the dissenting scientists are listed on:

    Quote:

    Yet public TV programs, educational policy statements, and science textbooks have asserted that Darwin's theory of evolution fully explains the complexity of living things. The public has been assured that all known evidence supports Darwinism and that virtually every scientist in the world believes the theory to be true.

    The scientists on this list dispute the first claim and stand as living testimony in contradiction to the second. Since Discovery Institute launched this list in 2001, hundreds of scientists have courageously stepped forward to sign their names.

  • drwtsn32
    drwtsn32
    How do you know what is true?

    I get a warm fuzzy in the cockles of my heart.

  • Leolaia
    Leolaia
    It just doesn't make sense. People like her would have us believe that a single cell with the complexity of a city is "simple".

    When have I ever said such a thing? What does "simple" even mean -- compared to what? Less complex compared to a larger system (an order of magnitude or more above) does not mean simple as an absence of complexity. The Jovian atmosphere is an incredibly complex super-system; scientists are a long way from providing a comprehensive account of it, although they understand some of the mechanics involved. But drop down several orders of magnitude to the subatomic level; quantum mechanics is also incredibly complex and scientists are a long way from giving a satisfactory account of it, then again they understand pretty well some of the mechanics involved.

  • JWoods
    JWoods
    Since Discovery Institute launched this list in 2001, hundreds of scientists have courageously stepped forward to sign their names.

    So what? Several million Jehovah's Witnesses believe this too - along with the idea that everyone else will die at God's hands within a few years.

    There are millions of nuts and just plain wrong people in the world - including scientists.

  • Perry
    Perry
    When have I ever said such a thing? What does "simple" even mean -- compared to what?

    Leolaia, I never said that you did. I said that people like you say that....meaning people that are dismissive of Creation in spite of mind-boggling complexity.

    Are you going to answer my question?

    How do you know Creation is false as you claim?

    In other words, can you offer any plausible explanation whatsoever that would account for the stupendous complexity of a single cell, with all the necessary parts apearing simultaneously that would not need an act of creation?

  • OnTheWayOut
    OnTheWayOut
    Still hiding from my questions? How do you know what is true?

    I told you to go to http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/members/adult/192102/8/Calling-Perry-Out-and-any-others-who-want-to-participate

    for further response. I imagine you already read it, but I will post it here, then I am done. I may tangle with you another day on another thread, Perry. But I am done on this one and all the current ones where you are living with your head in your ass. I got out of the JW's and don't bother debating with them for good reasons and it appears that the same reasons are present with you. Anyway, here were my two responses:

    #1

    Starting out convincing yourself that your crap is a complete answer and mine is not- that is a good way
    to have a healthy discussion.
    Anyway, you are the one who debates like that so I will just respond in kind.

    ... You are hardly worth debating if links like http://www.s8int.com/ are what you rely on. It is just as silly as
    your comments. It uses ridiculousness as its evidence.

    One quote on there is :"RICHARD DAWKINS, Oxford, an evolutionist, "If a single, well verified mammal skull
    were to turn up in 500 million year old rocks, our whole modern theory of evolution would be utterly destroyed." I whole-heartedly believe that this is either entirely wrong or just as out of context as WT magazine likes to be.
    If it is out of context, it is possible that Dawkins was simply asserting that we would have to come up with a
    more accurate "theory of evolution" and not to abandon it and switch to creationism. But whatever. the site is
    loaded with garbage. I will answer MORE on how I know something is true or not.
    I research, I read, I listen for a consensus among people that make sense and use their minds instead of just
    blindly accepting things. Sometimes, I don't know. I do not know if whales are the result of reverse evolution
    (mammals going from land to the sea) or if that theory will be discarded. Much of what Darwin has theorized has
    already been discarded. I know you think that means that evolution is garbage, but it really only means that
    man has admitted that we have found more evidence of "the truth" and the theories of the 19th century don't
    fit anymore. Some of the theories of the 21st century will be discarded as more things are discovered.

    So, I don't "know" that everything I believe is correct. I know plenty of lies because they are proven false by the
    stacks and stacks of evidence. If you look at ridiculous websites that support your beliefs but won't even consider
    actual evidence that there couldn't have been a worldwide flood, then good luck with that. I already answered that I do listen to the experts. But that doesn't mean I read one book or watch a few youtubes
    and ta-da. I focus mainly on knowing the lies and then what is left is truth. But truth also is rational. There is no
    absolute way to prove that God isn't out there, exactly as Perry believes He is. But there is no evidence that Flying
    Spaghetti Monster isn't actually the one out there. So truth is that there is no evidence that such unbelievable things
    are out there. Truth is that until otherwise proven, we don't need to put effort/faith in either of them. If that isn't the
    truth, then my only backup is that God is free to contact me and tell me what to do. Until He does, I am on my own.

    You don't know me at all. I did all that I could as an elder to forego judicial committees and let people off the hook.
    I learned early on that I might be wrong, but I didn't have the mastery of the ability to let go and overcome fear.
    I don't condemn Christians and scoff at their beliefs. But this forum is a place where such debate can take place.
    Even here, I only go so far as to condemn the idiocy of those like you, Perry, who boldly declare their beliefs without
    considering real evidence. But don't worry. Your own thoughts and links show you for what you are. If I have stated that you do damage to
    newbies, I apologize. People can see through your closed mind as well as I can.

    I was truly done with you there with that response, but you called me out on someone else's thread, so I responded again on my thread so as not to derail others' threads, so here is

    #2

    I am ending my participation in such threads by reposting my opening comments from a thread 7 months ago:

    For the record, I don't believe in the God of the Bible, and I find it hard to believe in the God of any religion on earth. I am closest to atheist in my beliefs if you want a traditional title, but I prefer "Rationalist." I will do God's will for me when He directly tells me what it is. Until then, I am fine on my own spiritual journey.

    That said, please feel free to state your own feelings/beliefs/spiritual journey. BUT, here's the point of the thread: JW's had to feel that they were "right" and all of "Christendom" and all of "Babylon the Great" were "wrong." They may have gotten that way when J.F. Rutherford discovered that self-induced "persecution" upon his flock could be manipulated into proof that they were on the "right" path to salvation. JW's are more about being "right" than anything else. They say that holidays and the cross and the military and the flag and birthdays and YADDA YADDA YADDA are "wrong." They say that door-to-door preaching, dedication to an organization, the stake, 1914, paradise on earth, YADDA YADDA YADDA are "right."

    I don't need to be right anymore. I don't have to prove the nonexistence or the existence of Sky Daddy, Thor, Jesus, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Jehovah, a trinity, Allah, whoever. I don't have to say there is sufficient evidence or a lack of evidence for evolution or for creationism.

    Sure, I will comment on such threads if I want to. The threads that lend themselves to such discussions are part of my spiritual journey. But the arguments get so petty and pretty funny. Keep up the humor, don't take yourselves too seriously. Some of you believe there is only one path to salvation, but some of us don't. If your God wants me to find it, He will contact me. If not, don't worry about me, life was fun.

    On the other side, some atheists, evolutionists, anti-Christians are insisting on their way of thought also. Lighten up on the creationists and Christians. If they never agree with us, does it really matter? We are above our old JW ways. We don't have to be "right" anymore. We just have to get along.

    Your thread was new so I responded, but I was already done with trying to have a decent conversation with you on the threads of others. Now I see I need to be done with you here also. (...and I know you really are not a troll like Trevor, it was a joke.)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit