cat1759, getingout, seven006, and Redhorsewoman --- You all have your feet on the ground. Right on.
I'm afraid that detective, et, al., are imbued with the same spirit of wishful thinging that most of the boomers have subscribed to during most of their lives. They seem to think that just because "they want to" is sufficent to change any policy or people to their way of thinking. They want omlets, but they don't want to break any eggs.
The Organization is simply ignoring their desires and demands and continuing with business as usual. That will continue until they get it through their heads that force is the only thing that the Society respects.
What they are trying to do can be illustrated this way: You come home and find that a rapist has forced his way into the house and is raping your daughter. They want us to tell the rapist, "I find your conduct very unsettling! You go to your room right now for a time out!" How far do you think they'd get? (And this is no more an exaggeration of their policy than there own depiction of bullets flying and drive-by shootings of Kingdom Halls.)
As I said before, the only thing the Society respects is force. Loose cannons can be very beneficial in circumstances like this, so Danni needn't be insulted by such a moniker. Plus, it appears that the elders themselves were far more out of control than Danni and her partner.
Danni --- If I was in your place, I'd push it. Publicize the name of the city and answer that veiled threat from the legal department. Their prime purpose is to intimidate you into shutting up and saying nothing more about it. Should you need any expert witnesses on their policies and treatment of their parishioners, say so. I know them extremely well. After all, I've been in and around them now for over 60 years.
Fairly soon I'm going to post a partial record of the skeletons in this congregation's background. You should find it interesting reading.
Tom Howell
Alias: LoneWolf