Are we providing the material for Damage Control? Are we making them look credible? Like giving them a "heads up" as to what is ssoooo wrong, and they're trying to fix the fallout! One case in point - questions and answers in the September 2010 KM. ..........
Oct 4th- "How is their work financed?" - "Why we report our field service?"
Sept 13th - "Does the bible require that we blindly believe in God(Borg)?"
Does it seem to anyone beside me, that the subjects brought up on these sites are being used as fodder to deflect the criticism & condemnation of the society? Sort of CYA! Otherwise why would they be so forthcoming to explain 'sticky' subjects, when in the past they were reluctant. What do you think? Maybe we should keep hammering away with Child Abuse issue!
clarity