LAROUCHE THROWS RIDICULERS TRIPLE CURVE (page 2)

ashitaka

I read some of it YOU KNOW, but I'm afraid I'm not really qualified to comment on it.

I am qualified to say hello, and good to see you. No matter how much we differ, I enjoy reading your posts.

Yet, what you said about the beauty of truth: truth is perception and experience.

You could call what I say lies, because you haven't seen my life for yourself. I could call what you say lies, because I'm convinced you're wrong. It doesn't really matter, though, because I think that all lovers of truth, whatever version it may be, as long as your heart is good, no matter what physical, financial, moral or spiritual collapse that the world may face, God will see the heart first, and each and every heart. He will judge accordingly.

Let's say what you believe is 100% correct. God doesn't care about correct or not. He searches the heart for what truth he can find in it, the amount of love that can be molded to fit his purposes, and he'll use it in any way possible. I don't think that the details mean too much to him. He wants the whole to be good, especially the heart.

Just wanted to comment on 'the beauty of truth' and 'unknowingly arriving at the same conclusion Jehovah did centuries before'.

ashi

Abaddon

expatbrit; I think Englishman means the Lancaster Bomber of WWII, which had two tailfins and four Rolls-Royce Merlin engines...

Although strictly speaking, it was the Spitfire and Hurricane that lead to Hitler abandoning the invasion, and heavy bombers that destroyed the manufacturing base later in the war... so, four wings and two Merlins? Was the Hurricane Merlin powered too? Can't remember. I just know in MSCFS the Hurricane is a good choice, even though it's underpowered and only has machine guns, as it's so damn easy to fly and manuverable.

You Know; Hello. Come back to pimp for LaRouche eh? Funny how the article is written as though by an independant journalist, and published on his own website... anyone who didn't know might think that was independent validation, but I guess honesty, along with accuracy, is not LaRouche's strong-suit.

People living in glass paradigms shouldn't throw stones...

expatbrit

It seems that my life's quest to find famous Finnish people must go on....

Expatbrit

safe4kids

You Know,

Welcome back...had a good chuckle over your cyberholics line

Expat,

I'm not Finnish, but I am finished...does that count?

Dana

You Know

XPATBRIT says:

I look forward to reading about LaRouche's predictive successes in respectable publications such as The Economist and The Financial Times

You poor ignoramus. The Financial Times and Wall Street Journal, and similar publications, are the flagship propaganda outlets for the financial oligarchy that has been responsible for inflating the biggest financial bubble in history. Nervertheless, they are not totally insane, as they do recognize, in their more candid moments, that the present IMF system is doomed to failure at some point in the near future. However, while they will never mention LaRouche's name, they are not above stealing his ideas and repackaging them as their own. What you probably don't realize is that while the mainstream media and ruling establishment don't want you to know about LaRouche, many within the establishment follow his writings very closely. This article in the Financial Times pretty much verifies everything LaRouche has said about the need to put the whole deal into bankruptcy receivership and start anew, which is what he calls the New Bretton Woods.

Of course, I have it on my inside sources that LaRouche is going to fail in his bid to convince the remnants of the republic to take the reins of control before disaster stikes, and that the system is going to experince a catastrophic blowout and collapse into a New Dark Age as LaRouche and others fear. Just having the foresight to see a looming nightmare doesn't necessarily mean that it can be avoided.

/ You Know

Click here for Financial Times piece:
> http://specials.ft.com/worldeconomy2001/FT3FOPMVJUC.html

expatbrit

LOLOLOL! I just won $10 off myself!

Expatbrit

You Know

LOLOLOL! I just won $10 off myself!

It figures. I suppose that's what Enron and the Financial Times would call a 100% profit. LOL / You Know

expatbrit

YK:

Don't forget that I've also increased GDP!

That was an economist joke. Funny, wasn't it?

Expatbrit

Will Power

You Know
You don't work for the accounting firm that handled enron do you?
forcing collaspe?
What other accounts do you handle?

You Know

You Know You don't work for the accounting firm that handled enron do you? forcing collaspe? What other accounts do you handle?

Interestingly enough, LaRouche had cited Enron years ago as typifying the sort of rapacious speculative excesses that have been behind the financial trajectory of the Triple Curve model. And apparently the LaRouche movement was responsible indirectly for bringing it down, when, at LaRouche's urging, Gray Davis finally stood up against what he called the "Pirates of Houston," who were looting California a few months ago. When, as a result of pubic expousure, Enron was forced to relent on their strangle hold thereby allowing the price of utilities to drop, that caused their financial derivatives pyramid to quickly come unwound. The thing is, Enron was not an anomally. There are a bunch of other "Enrons" out there. Some are even bigger and will collapse with much more force. / You Know

Enron > http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2848lar_enron.html

LAROUCHE THROWS RIDICULERS TRIPLE CURVE

Share this