Marked [Note: there are 2 threads]
Excellent work, Cofty.
The Watchtower are Right About Blood...
by cofty 556 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
-
-
Fisherman
Numbers 15:30-31 falsifies your theory.
-
cofty
De 15:30-31 falsifies your theory. - Fishy
Deuteronomy 15 only has 23 verses you muppet
-
cofty
Fishy???
Care to try again?
-
Fisherman
Numbers15:30-31 falsifies your theory.
-
cofty
Numbers 15:30-31 falsifies your theory. - Fishy
Did you just stick a pin in your bible and choose a verse at random?
Please read the OP again and then the longer explanation at this link and then tell us specifically what Num.15:30,31 has to do with the topic.
-
Fisherman
"If an Israelite farmer found an animal "already dead" he was free to eat it with impunity. - Lev.11:38,39. Once an animal has been dead for more than a few minutes it is physically impossible to bleed it, so under these circumstances the Law is giving permission to eat unbled meat." Cofty
-
cofty
Yes that is what Lev.11 says. Compare Leviticus 17.
Numbers 15 has nothing to do with the price of fish
-
Fisherman
Deliberately violating any law subject to "cutting off" = eating un-bled meat.
(Numbers 15:30, 31) 30 “‘But the person who does something deliberately, whether he is native-born or a foreign resident, is blaspheming Jehovah and must be cut off from among his people. 31 Because he has despised Jehovah’s word and broken his commandment, that person should be cut off without fail. His own error is upon him.’”
-
cofty
There was NO LAW against eating unbled meat of an animal found already dead. None at all.
It resulted only in temporary ceremonial uncleanness exactly the same as if you had buried the dead animal - or had sex with your wife.