I've been thinking alot over the past few days on what makes a Christian a Christian, and I'm coming to some different conclusions than I ever have...
The Watchtower likes to use the term "TRUE believers" or "TRUE Christians". I'm at a loss here lately. You are either an atheist or you are not. There is no such thing as a TRUE atheist. That could be applied to Christians, right? You are either a Christian or you are not. There is no such thing as a TRUE Christian.
(I have DEFINITELY been guilty of this in the past) But it seems like by the use of the word "True", the writer or speaker is trying to make such a large distinction, that it verges on bigotry. "I am the TRUE Christian...but YOU, you worthless peon, are not a TRUE Christian."
How arrogant! And how illogical. A Chrisitian is a christian. A muslim is a muslim. An Atheist is an Atheist. IMO, the only reason for placing the word "TRUE" in front of Christian is to try and imply that the other Christian is so wrong that they cannot be a Christian. If you want to be so arrogant, why not just say, "No, you are really NOT a Christian." Or, "No, you are not really a believer." Or whatever.
Does this post make sense?
I do