Ah, Coffy, Coffy, Coffy... you still miss the point. Please refer to OTWO's comments. Thanks!
A slave of Christ,
SA
The Hobbit and Evolution: So What's Up With That?
by AGuest 125 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
cofty
Its Cofty
I get your point - its been answered more than once. Science seeks truth through evidence. Darwin got lots of things wrong. We get it.
Some things will NEVER change - the earth revolves around the sun - every living thing on planet earth including humans share a common ancestor
I don't want to be rude but I can't tolerate you patronising Shelby
-
AGuest
Its Cofty
Perhaps, but I am choosing to call you "Coffy" and since an accurate name doesn't matter, I expect you to respond when I do. Otherwise, I'll be forced to consider you a nasty slang name for the male genital appendage. Right? Which point you DIDN'T seem to get...
We get it.
Then that should have been the end of it, yes?
I don't want to be rude but I can't tolerate you patronising Shelby
You are often rude, Coffy, and vulgar... but I tolerate you. Because I know you don't know any better. If you, however, can't tolerate me, perhaps you should do what I have suggested on many occasions... and refrain from opening/reading/responding to my threads. Surely, you have that much self-control?
A slave of Christ,
SA, who really isn't in the mood to accommodate you, right now...
-
cofty
I have not the remotest idea what you are on about nor the patience/interest to try to work it out
-
OnTheWayOut
While much of science needs to stop stating things as facts when they might be shown later to be in error, that doesn't mean that finding some articles that suggest that the scientific world will be turned upside down because of these findings is reprentative of any "facts" either.
Just as scientists are fighting for dollars, journals and magazines and reports are fighting for attention to get those dollars.
You have to watch out for sensationalistic stuff on all sides.
What gets peoples' attention more, saying "Scientists are puzzled" or "Scientists are shocked and divided" ?
-
AGuest
I have not the remotest idea what you are on about
Of course, you don't. Hypocrites rarely have the remotest idea... "about" themselves. But to enlighten you, it is a bit hypocritical, is it not, to call God a "prick" for insisting on being called by the right name... regardless of what others choose... and then take issue when someone chooses to call you by an incorrect name?
Does THAT bring you "remotely" closer?
A slave of Christ,
SA
-
AGuest
I "hear" you, Jer. MY point, however, is that... wherever it originates... it is the same thing: fiction, while attempting to stand as "fact." I am not saying that science is wrong, per se. And you KNOW I don't follow/support religion at all. I'm just... intrigued... by the finger pointing... when both camps dabble in the same thing.
That's it, that's all.
Peace!
A slave of Christ,
SA
-
cofty
Hypocrites rarely have the remotest idea
How very unpleasant you can be at times.
I mildly object to your deliberate change to my username and you compare that to your god ignoring a heartfelt plea for help because the supplicant doesn't know the secret magic name. Yes a god like that would be a prick.
By the way you ae now confusing two different threads - either that or just changing the subject
-
moshe
I was going to say something about counter-proof against a worldwide flood- last time I checked the flood should have washed this counter-proof away. Even Jesus didn't know about these paleolithic artists.
-
bohm
If we just pretend Cofty is steaming foaming mad right now about the name-thing, would that not just go to show the whole "use-my-name-dammit" thing is a bit silly and undignifying, in particular to a divine creature without adrenaline glands? besides, as cofty quite clearly point out, his name is written in plains sight, Gods name is (as i understand you) revealed in dreams to very few people after they have found the right attitude...