I was just thinking of something this morning. When presented with the possibility that the Witnesses could be wrong, the typical response is 'Where else is there to go?' In short, 'If not us, who?' In that question, however, lies an assumption, based on a belief that was taught to us by those wishing to reinforce belief in their organization--or really, that belonging to the right organization is what matters most. Ultimately, there's a major implication in that belief: Find the true organization/religion, and find the true God. The real question that this reasoning demands is: Which one are we actually looking for?
I would think you're more likely to succeed if you find the true God first and go from there. The men of faith in Hebrews 11 were individuals, many of whom were supposedly in 'God's organization', yet stood out from their contemporaries because most people 'in the organization' weren't doing the right thing, especially those taking the lead! Therein lies the major problem: the Watchtower organization, by its own law, denies you the right to do the right thing! If a belief is wrong, there is no option to simply refrain from believing it or teaching it to others. If a rule is wrong, there is no option to exercise your personal conscience and disobey it. If injustice happens because of a rule, there is no option to speak out against the injustice.
I wonder if Enoch, Gideon, or any of the others mentioned as men of faith were content to wait for some group of men to do the right thing. In Gideon's case, they were all Israelites, they had the Law. Why didn't he 'wait on Jehovah' to move the priesthood to stop the idolatry? Wasn't he 'running ahead'? Apparently not, as God supported his desire to do the right thing. Would God expect us to wait for someone else to decide what's right, and then obey, or for us to look to the guidance he has already given in the Bible and obey?
Jesus warned about those who stumble others. But he didn't say that those who were stumbled by others would get a free pass. That being said, rather than saying, "Where else is there to go?", I said, "I better go elsewhere." Because I'm responsible for myself. The organization is not loyal enough to me to take responsibility for my fate, so why should I be loyal enough to it to take responsibility for its misdeeds?
--sd-7