LAWSUIT: The Strange Saga of Lorterdan Properties at Ramapo v. Watchtower of NY

by AndersonsInfo 34 Replies latest watchtower scandals

  • AndersonsInfo
    AndersonsInfo

    The Strange Saga of Lorterdan Properties at Ramapo v. Watchtower of New York

    Information compiled by Barbara Anderson

    On February 27, 2009, The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. (“Watchtower”) purchased 248 acres of land located in Ramapo, New York, from a company named Lorterdan Properties at Ramapo I, LLC (“Lorterdan”). Things slowly went sour and twenty-seven months later, Lorterdan served a lawsuit against Watchtower asking the court for five determinations:

    1) Declaratory Judgment (asking court to interpret the contractual rights)

    2) Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

    3) Breach of Contract

    4) Specific Performance/Preliminary Injunction/Permanent Injunction, and

    5) Breach of Contract for (Watchtower’s) Failure to pay Plaintiff the Sum of $9.5 Million upon determining it would proceed with the Development

    Likewise, Watchtower is countersuing Lorterdan for Declaratory Judgment, Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Inducement, and Specific Performance.

    As of today, this court case is still on-going. The information in this review was taken from court documents filed by both parties and from newspapers.

    The parties in this lawsuit are: Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc. (One of many corporate bodies acting in behalf of the religion of Jehovah’s Witnesses), and Lorterdan Properties at Ramapo I, LLC. (A closely held company, whose owners are listed as Robert Jackson, Foun Chong Fan, MD, the Fan Family Trust, and Scott Blow.)

    The Preliminary Statement by Lorterdan is telling: “On its website, Watchtower promotes the virtues of honesty, forgiveness, and altruism as those amongst its very foundation. In particular, (Watchtower’s) website declares that ‘being considered trustworthy is something to be proud of.’” Lorterdan accuses the Watchtower of a “tremendous breach of trust.”

    What conspired between the parties? What was the deal?

    http://www.freeminds.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3120:the-strange-saga-of-lorterdan-properties-at-ramapo-v-watchtower-of-new-york&catid=33:business&Itemid=348

  • sd-7
    sd-7

    Hmm. Well, if Watchtower filed documents with the town, which would be a matter of public record, wouldn't that constitute basically informing Lorterdan of their intention to rezone the property, thus requiring them to pay the $9.5 million? They would have to know that Lorterdan would (or could) find out. They represented in a public manner their intent, which I would think, even if they never represented in writing to Lorterdan, would constitute an intention. So at the very least, what they did was misleading, as they were planning something else altogether with the land.

    However, as no formal statement was made to Lorterdam, that might work in the WT's favor. In the strictest sense of the contract, they could probably get out of it. But what about the applications they filed with the town? Hmm. If they won, would that void those contracts or leave Lorterdan with the bill? I'm no legal expert, but it's a cryin' shame, whatever is going on...

    --sd-7

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    It's amazing what you can do with a team of free lawyers in the USA.

  • No Room For George
    No Room For George

    Maybe Band on the Run, or anybody else with legal expertise can comment on this, but I'm under the impression that the WT is in the right on this. Since when did "good faith" ever trump what's written on a contract? Granted, the WT markets itself as a bastion of light and integrity, when we all know that couldn't be further from the truth, no pun intended. However, what they and that company agreed upon is on paper, and the WT all along had the right within two years of the contract to notify Lorterdan of its decision not to proceed with developement. At that point Lorterdan was to repurchase the land for what it was originally sold to the WT for, and the other 9.5million that the WT was responsible for, was to be negated.

    For whatever reason the WT decided not to develope the land, and gave enough notice of their lack of action, according to the contract's verbiage. Was it unscrupulous, especially considering all of the WT's actions related to the Community Benefit Agreement? Without a doubt. Still, according to the contract as long as the WT was in the specific time frame to notify that they're not going to proceed with developement, Lorterdan was to comply by repurchasing the land.

    Does this Lorterdan have a case, based upon, good faith? Has good faith ever swayed a case in times past?

  • stuckinamovement
    stuckinamovement

    Sounds like a messy case. I hope the WTS gets a black eye on this.

    SIAM

  • sir82
    sir82
    a team of free lawyers

    Actually, the WTS often pays outside legal firms to handle cases. A lot of JW lawyers get a big portion of their business from the WTS, and the WTS pays them the full rate. Yes I know a JW lawyer.

    That said, In this particular case, given that the lawsuit is in NY, and the Bethel in-house attorneys are licensed to practice in NY, and this is a very prominent case involving lots of money, I'm sure the WTS has its "free lawyers" working on it as their highest priority.

  • sabastious
    sabastious

    It would not be hard to convince high up Watchtower people to get an education in Law, for God's will of course. I wonder if these people have ethics? The Watchtower, for ages, has been littered with anti-higher education propoganda. But for some reason God's earthly organization requires a secular education of members to continue to exist. Do these people feel they are sacrificing their holiness for the greater good? Are they empowered with some sort of shield from wordly desires?

    I would love to be a fly on the wall with a notebook for one of these infamous Watchtower lawyers.

    -Sab

  • sabastious
    sabastious

    DJEggnog said he was studying to become a lawyer. I always suspected that he was using this forum to study up before he got into practice. It pains me to think about Eggy actually having charge over people's lives. *shudder*

    -Sab

  • clarity
    clarity

    Geez no wonder watchtower wants our jewelery, RSPs, homes and first born son!!

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    sir82:

    "Actually, the WTS often pays outside legal firms to handle cases."

    Good point. They have a team of free lawyes, and they spend tons of Worldwide Work donation money on lawyers.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit