Apostates right now are looking to a book called the Gentile Times Reconsidered as the next gospel, as it would indicate the date of the fall of Jerusalem being later than 607, which in turn would make null the chronology of 1914
What about secular historians? They have no vested interest in having a specific date for the destruction of Jerulasem. The Watchtower does have an extreme bias? Why shouldn't he consider an unbiased source rather than one that is extremely biased?
Now Christ was already in heaven. He had already been granted authority over everything in heaven and on earth. He was already presiding as head of the congregation.
Use his words against him here. If this is true, (he quotes it from Matt 28:18) then why any need at all for 1914? Jesus had already been given ALL AUTHORITY so the whole idea of 1914 is a steaming pile of doo-doo.
You could probably counterpoint him all day and all night long with that long winded e-mail, but I'm sure you already know that.