You da man, Wuz!
I believe Rutherford had sharecroppers or tenant farmers on that land of his in Missouri.
After he took the reins of WT stewardship, he certainly modeled it along the lines of a plantation.
by wasblind 68 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
You da man, Wuz!
I believe Rutherford had sharecroppers or tenant farmers on that land of his in Missouri.
After he took the reins of WT stewardship, he certainly modeled it along the lines of a plantation.
Da Man ??????
Mrs. Jones , Ziddina help me out here !!!!!!!!
ROFL!
Ok, I retract that.
Tee hee hee.
In a really brazen twist of irony, Boss Man affectionately calls himself "The Slave". TM
Forgive me, but I find this comparison of African chattel slavery and the experience of JWs to be offensive in the extreme.
Would you mind explaining why or do you want us to guess?
I'm all for a good hyperbole, mrsjones, but I think this goes much too far even for the boundaries of bad taste. West Africans were brought here literally in chains and were literally property. JW-ism, for all its faults, is still a voluntary organization. To end it, people merely need to exercise their will; we do not require the slaughter of 750,000 Americans to end it. "All the markings of slavery," with the JWs? Please, that's not even funny.
Wasblind, who happens to be a black woman as am I, wasnt making light of slavery in her comparison. In no form does Was appear to think slavery is or was a joke. Is there another reason why the comparison makes you uncomfortable or do you feel slavery in the Americas should never be brought up for comparison or examination?
Sulla,
I'm gonna give you a chance, to defend the WTS against my so-called exaggerations
WARNING: you better make it good, i'll even give you time, to get what you got to say together
Trust, your gonna need the head start
wasblind, you cannot be serious.
mrsjones, I think such a comparison, when taken seriously, distorts both the experience of slavery in the US and the experience of JWs. In the process, it does great violence to the crucial distinction: a JW can always simply decide to not be a JW. A slave would be killed. But, if I haven't given you reason to question your viewpoint, then your viewpoint cannot be changed. That doesn't make it less odious.