Hmmm.
I've been thinking of starting a thread on a closely-related topic, myself.
Has anyone ever noticed how the death toll in natural disasters, like earthquakes, tsunamis, tornadoes and the like, are always far, far lower than the population total in that area??
Look at the "kill rate" of tornadoes in the U.S.A....
The "Tri-State Tornado" outbreak of 1925 killed 695 people...
But look at the population levels in that area at the same time.
Murphysboro, Illinois, had 12,000 people in 1925, and lost only 234 people to that "Tri-State" oubreak. At the same time, the tornado outbreak DESTROYED 15,000 homes over its total three-state path of destruction....
http://www.semp.us/publications/biot_reader.php?BiotID=191
Soooo..... 695 people compared to 15,000 homes destroyed... That's a destruction rate of 21.58 homes per person killed.
And that was back in 1925, before the human race's ability to issue warnings improved.
If Witnesses are expecting to have ANYTHING left over after "Armageddon", then "Jehovah" had better use microbes instead of tornadoes, earthquakes, volcanoes, tsunamis, and so on...
The violent natural disasters are ALWAYS more destructive to property than effective at killing off humans...