I am well aware that many members of this board adhere to the view that the WT and/or The Bible is contradictory. The question is: If Paul Grundy is so enlightened as to 'the truth about the truth', why is he so contradictory?
Jwfacts to me (in a personal message): "Much of the information at jwfacts.com is from the research of people far more gifted then me,and comes from JWN. The arguments on my site are there becausethey are the ones that ex-JWs use, not the other way around."
Jwfacts today: "BTW, that list you are discussing is from Franz, who came to believe that the great crowd is in heaven.. Why do you think anyone is going to take your arguments seriously, when you are only regurgitating what you are told, and what any JW or exJW has been told for years."
Jwfacts today (explaining why he uses these arguments): "Secondly, I discredit the Watchtower because it is a deceitful and dangerous cult."
Previously he says: The arguments are there because they are the ones that ex-JW's use.
Jwfacts in his Trinity article: A human cannot hope to understand the reality of the Nature of God; spiritual beings are beyond the comprehension of physical beings. The closest a fleshly being can come to understanding the spiritual realm, a realm unknown to daily reality or scientific understanding, is through the approximations of antropomorphological statements. For this reason, any description of God is merely a vague humanised likeness. As the reality of God is an unsolvable mystery, incomprehensible until we see him "face to face"."
Jwfacts later writes: "In the first place, the article was not siding with the Trinity, it was showing why other people firmly believe it."
Then he writes: "It does say the trinity is correct."
Jwfacts says: "I do not need to point people to another belief. ..But as I try to do by showing why certain doctrine is wrong I do not need to tell them to believe another doctrine, or another organisation. All I need to do is help people learn to think and see other points of view so that they can move on to healthier ways of thinking. "
Jwfacts then says: "In certain teachings, such as the Great Crowd of Other Sheep,it is quite obvious what the Bible meant, so I present that
In fact nearly every doctrinal article is 'presenting' 'another doctrine' or 'another belief'.
When will the contradictions stop Jwfacts?