Are Aliens Monitoring Nuclear Weapons?

by metatron 34 Replies latest jw friends

  • elderelite
    elderelite

    Seriously, how could you possibly calculate the energy required to open a portal that dosent even exsistnin theory let alone practice? Thats the biggest load of self agrandizing "oh look at me im smart" nonsense ive read today....

  • blondie
    blondie

    Power and greater technology doesn't equal benevolence and support. As many tribes in Africa and North and South America can attest to.

  • blondie
  • DarioKehl
    DarioKehl

    Seriously, how could you possibly calculate the energy required to open a portal that dosent even exsistnin theory let alone practice? Thats the biggest load of self agrandizing "oh look at me im smart" nonsense ive read today....

    Wow. Nothing goes better with coffee, bacon and a soft boiled egg than an accusation of "self agrandizing" (sic). Game on! (cracks knuckles)...

    First of all, I'll address elderelite's comment in the voice and candance of Dr. Sheldon Cooper: "Excuse me--how could you possibly calculate the energy??? ...doesn't even "existnin" (sic) theory let alone practice??? Nonsense??? Under what rock have you been living?"

    There is an entire field of study called theoretical physics where scientists do calculate the energies of extremely tiny and unfathomably large physical reactions. There are scientists who spend their entire careers researching the mathematics that describe and predict problems just like these. So, not only do these questions exist in theory, it is also possible to calculate them. The reason they don't appear "in practice" yet is because, as I stated in my earlier post, the amount of energy required is prohibitive.

    I do not engage in self aggrandizing (that word has 2 "G's," BTW) and take offense at your suggestion that I do. Nor do I simply pull random things from betwixt my butt cheeks. After a rigourous and exhausting Google search entry (which lasted all of 5 seconds), I found this article to back up my statement. I invite you to search things out for yourself, too. You'd be amazed at how many answers there are out there. Have I made mistakes? Yes. Probably 6 or 7 of them as I've been sitting here typing this up. Do I mind being "called out" on them? Not at all--especially if someone submits proof to back up their claim and refute one of mine. However, to simply assert a blind label on someone's motives (who you don't even know) is not acceptable and I will defend myself. Should I have posted this link last night? Looking back on it, yes. But as an imperfect person, it was late, I was tired and did a lazy job. I'll go bathe in the Ganges to cleanse myself. Here's a NASA link describing the energy required for a warp drive system:

    http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/technology/warp/ideachev.html

    You may also enjoy Leonard Susskind's book, The Black Hole War. I don't claim to be smart, just well read.

  • elderelite
    elderelite

    You are a well read clown, with one c, if you think people talking about technology that dosent exsist have anymore basis to describe the power required to use said technology than you. Its like claiming time travel needs 1.21 jigawatts of electricity. How could you possible know...? Its all theory. Unproven and the vast majority destined to be disproven. But feel free to continue! Its always fun watching people proclaim what cant be done. Its even more fun watching it be done.

  • DarioKehl
    DarioKehl

    I take it you didn't read the link.

    Well, I did what I could do. I wash my hands of this.

  • DarioKehl
    DarioKehl

    Wait a sec. Hold the phone. I'm a "clown, with one c." As opposed to a clown with multiple C's?

    Don't short change me, here!

  • Satanus
    Satanus

    'Black hole war'?=(

    S

  • Chariklo
    Chariklo

    I'm with DarioKehl on this one, ElderE.

    Its like claiming time travel needs 1.21 jigawatts of electricity. How could you possible know...? Its all theory. Unproven and the vast majority destined to be disproven.

    Bit flat-earth, isn't it? I too have heard this, quite independently.

  • DarioKehl
    DarioKehl

    Yup. It's a fantastic read, Satanus! If you're in to that stuff. Susskind is a plumber by trade, but also a PhD Physicist. He's the only guy on earth who successfully proved Stephen Hawking wrong. His "common man" blue-collar background makes this book an easy and enjoyable read for lay people.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit