How could it be reasonable for Jesus to condemn skeptics today when one of his own apostles, who had witnessed Jesus pre-death miracles, refused to believe in the resurrection until he had physical proof?
Doesn't the fact that Jesus willingly gave Thomas the requested proof set a precedent for all other skeptics down through time? Isn't the burden of proof on Jesus to provide indisputable evidence that he is now alive given that so much time has passed since his claimed resurrection, and until he does that, it would be immoral for Jesus to judge anyone?
Isn't that especially also the case since God took no action to prevent numerous religious "artfully contrived stories" and other claimed holy scriptures to be invented with their millions of adherents?