Cedars, can't remember if Rick had a say in whether or not Patterson would be acceptable as surety in place of the bond, but if so, why would they object to this being used?
I know that purchasing the fee for the bond will cost them REAL cash out of pocket, 87,000 or so per year I believe, but would not the allowing of the Patterson facility cause more possible bad press for the WTBTS even if it was never had to be sold. I realize that they would never actually sell the Patterson facility to pay off the money owed to Candice Conti.
So if they had a say in what could be used as security, did they deny the Patterson facility to cause the WTBTS to lose money on the fee?
Also, where are they on the e for the bond, have not heard much about that lately.
NJY