"The story of Noah's ark and its associated flood continues to be retold to children and studied by theologians, alike. While some dismiss it as a mere fable, others believe wholeheartedly that the event literally unfolded, with a massive down-pouring of water ravaging the earth at God's command. Among those who believe that Noah's flood was a very real historical occurrence is Robert Ballard, one of the world's most famed archaeologists.
Ballard, known for finding the Titanic, is now searching for evidence of one of history's most talked-about events. Unlike other investigators who have their minds set on finding the actual ship, Ballard and his team have gone to Turkey to search for clues and evidence that corroborates the notion that a flood wiped away civilization thousands of years ago.".... Read the rest at the website.
I don't remember anyone posting a thread on Robert Ballard's quest to find evidence for the Flood.
We are challenged to believe with faith, this does not help the skeptic or human who has pondered the suffering of humanity or the problem of evil. I wish Jehovah had left the "ark" frozen at the top of one of these mountains, if there was a giant Ark burried under the snow of Everest, would you believe in the Bible again or would you think it was a hoax? What amount of evidence would it take to regain your faith in the Bible?
What of the "Giants of Genesis" if a fifteen to eighteen foot human hybrid was found, would it take more than one for you to accept the Genesis account? How much evidence would it take for your believe in God to be revived? I had skeptics tell me "I would only accept God if he made me God, if he made me God, he would no longer be God, therefore God can't exist! If God can't make me God, he is not God!" How can you win with a circular reasoning fallacy? I hate that argument that makes no sense.