According to Juan's post on page 2:
Then I noticed as I scanned through the names that one person in particular seemed to be referring the majority of these unknowns. At that point I brought my concerns to the attention of the other advisors and the officers of AAWA. Their first reaction was that this was not necessarily a bad thing.
Notice that he freely admitted that even he (Juan) had expressed his concerns about people being outed. He makes it perfectly clear that the board at AWAA was delighted at this and thought that it wasn't a bad thing. The publicity for the group clearly overrode any concern for any damage this might cause others.
At that point Bo had to make a decision about what to do with our Facebook page and we all agreed to let him just go ahead and make it "open to all."
Now we have an admission that this was indeed now an 'open' group. Not 'closed', not 'secret', but 'open'.
It was only after we took that step and the whole affair became news here on JWN that we started getting complaints that some of those people who had been "referred" or "recommended" to the site were unhappy that someone had done that without their knowledge.
It was only after the group had been created 'open' that this blew up into a PR mess for the AWAA. It's still not clear what happened afterwards, but it became only closed or secret after it was once 'open'. It might be secret now, but it was open before and that's what all this fuss is about.
For what it is worth, I think Juan is the only one here that is giving us any clear and honest answers, and he deserves to be commended for that. The same can not be said concerning the behaviour of others involved in this.