Yeah, on second thought I'd need to agree with you LizO, this is probably not the place for you. You've started off angry here, not the best start.
Like you I want evidence so when I see a post that says Rutherford had mistresses and I was unaware of that, I don't repeat that to anyone else, I'll happily wait till I see evidence. Just because there's not a link next to a post doesn't mean it's not true but rather than get annoyed about it maybe you should address the specifics and ask those individuals to provide the evidence, once done if you still don't agree then that's fine, that's allowed.
what I am surprised about is that on most things here there's an overwhelming amount of evidence to support claims made
The GB might not be sitting there in Bethel 'knowing' they are lying (although some I suspect are) but a lie is a lie is a lie, as it were. I don't need to add anymore examples, there's been many quoted here, if that isn't enough to help you see how the wbts runs then nothing will.
i wish you all the best in your search (if you do search)
p.s I never once got the impression that Ray Franz was bitter. He was sad. He came across as humble to me and freely admitted his own faults, unlike the wt masters of today. Food for thought.