A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC (page 20)

MrFreeze

If you use the WT's own timeline of kings you get 587... except they add in one non-existent king for which there is no proof.

scholar

Jeffro

Your attitude to the Bible and Jesus Christ is deplorable and undermines anything you say. Your credibility is torn to shreds. I want nothing more to do with you.

scholar JW

2+2=5

I cannot help you with the identity and qualifications of the celebrated WT scholars for that remains a mystery as with the researchers that confirmed the data pertaining to VAT 4956.

Can we at least know who celebrates them, besides 7million ignorant JWs?

scholar

Mr Freeze

You cannot get 587 by using the WT timeline. What non-existent king are you talking about?

scholar JW

2+2=5

Jeffro

Your attitude to the Bible and Jesus Christ is deplorable and undermines anything you say. Your credibility is torn to shreds. I want nothing more to do with you..

Well then this settles it. Forget science, forget historians, because the vast majority of them share his opinion of the Bible.

This is almost as funny as referring to yourself in the third person.

scholar

2+2=5

They are celebrated by means of reputation and doing a good job. It is similar to the fact that the NWT is the most brilliant Bible the world has ever seen.

How is that for praise and celebratory speech?

scholar JW

MrFreeze

I'll have to look up my research... don't have time right now as I am off to work. Will check back and post later unless someone else has the WT timeline of Babylonian kings handy.

Jeffro

scholar:

Your attitude to the Bible and Jesus Christ is deplorable and undermines anything you say. Your credibility is torn to shreds. I want nothing more to do with you.

Oh no. You can't imagine how upset I am. I'm sorry I couldn't tell you I thought baby Jesus will save the unicorns.

(And a pretty obvious copout for not being able to defend his ridiculous beliefs.)

Jeffro

scholiar:

They are celebrated by means of reputation

No. Most people have never heard of them. What most people do know about them is negative. Scholars are annoyed with how the WTS misrepresents them. If the WTS wasn't such a minor insignificant religion, there would probably be more complaints about them.

and doing a good job.

And... No. They have a dreadful track record of inaccuracy, backpedalling, flip-flopping, and bizarre eisegesis.

scholar

2+2=5

Well you can forget science and historians but you will remain in ignorance. The wise person seeks wisdom and knowledge, understanding and truth. Those who share Jeffro's opinion are called Higher critics and the consequence of their thinking is confusion and muddled thinking so it is better to seek the views of scholars who have a different philosophy.

scholar JW

A Video Series about 607 BC vs 587 BC

Share this